Validation and clinical impact of novel pericoronary adipose tissue measurement on ECG-gated non-contrast chest CT
- PMID: 36754662
- DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.01.021
Validation and clinical impact of novel pericoronary adipose tissue measurement on ECG-gated non-contrast chest CT
Abstract
Background and aims: We aimed to develop a method for quantifying pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) on electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated non-contrast CT (NC-PCAT) and validate its efficacy and prognostic value.
Methods: We retrospectively studied two independent cohorts. PCAT was quantified conventionally. NC-PCAT was defined as the mean CT value of epicardial fat tissue adjacent to right coronary artery ostium on ECG-gated non-contrast CT. In cohort 1 (n = 300), we evaluated the correlation of two methods and the association between NC-PCAT and CT-verified high-risk plaque (HRP). We dichotomized cohort 2 (n = 333) by the median of NC-PCAT, and assessed the prognostic value of NC-PCAT for primary endpoint (all-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction) by Cox regression analysis. The median duration of follow-up was 2.9 years.
Results: NC-PCAT was correlated with PCAT (r = 0.68, p<0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, high NC-PCAT (OR:1.06; 95%CI:1.03-1.10; p = 0.0001), coronary artery calcium score (CACS) (OR:1.01 per 10 CACS increase, 95%CI:1.00-1.02; p = 0.013), and current smoking (OR:2.58; 95%CI:1.03-6.49; p = 0.044) were independent predictors of HRP. Among patients with CACS>0 (n = 193), NC-PCAT (OR:1.06; 95%CI:1.03-1.10; p = 0.0002), current smoking (OR:3.02; 95%CI:1.17-7.82; p = 0.027), and male sex (OR:2.81; 95%CI:1.06-7.48; p = 0.028) were independent predictors of HRP, whereas CACS was not (p = 0.15). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed high NC-PCAT as an independent predictor of the primary endpoint, even after adjustment for sex and age (HR:4.3; 95%CI:1.2-15.2; p = 0.012).
Conclusions: There was a positive correlation between NC-PCAT and PCAT, with high NC-PCAT significantly associated with worse clinical outcome (independent of CACS) as well as presence of HRP.
Keywords: Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Pericoronary adipose tissue; Vascular inflammation.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Comment in
-
No contrast? No problem! Value in assessing pericoronary fat in non-contrast studies.Atherosclerosis. 2023 Apr;370:3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Atherosclerosis. 2023. PMID: 36925333 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
