Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 8;6(1):e148.
doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.470. eCollection 2023.

Current landscape of research ethics consultation services: National survey results

Affiliations

Current landscape of research ethics consultation services: National survey results

Holly A Taylor et al. J Clin Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of a research ethics consultation service (RECS) is to assist relevant parties in navigating the ethical issues they encounter in conduct of research. The goal of this survey was to describe the current landscape of research ethics consultation and document if and how it has changed over the last decade.

Methods: The survey instrument was based on the survey previously circulated. We included a number of survey domains from the previous survey with the goal of direct comparison of outcomes. The survey was sent to 57 RECS in the USA and Canada.

Results: Forty-nine surveys were completed for an overall response rate of 86%. With the passing of 10 years, the volume of consults received by RECS surveyed has increased. The number of consults received by a subset of RECS remains low. RECS continues to receive requests for consults from a wide range of stakeholders. About a quarter of RECS surveyed actively evaluate their services, primarily through satisfaction surveys routinely shared with requestors. The number of RECS evaluating their services has increased. We identified a group of eight key competencies respondents find as key to providing RECS.

Conclusions: The findings from our survey demonstrate that there have been growth and development of RECS since 2010. Further developing evaluation and competency guidelines will help existing RECS continue to grow and facilitate newly established RECS maturation. Both will allow RECS personnel to better serve their institutions and add value to the research conducted.

Keywords: Research ethics; competencies; consultation; human subject research; national survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Research Ethics Consultation Service.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Most common type of ethical concern brought to research ethics consultation services (n = 42).

Similar articles

References

    1. Beskow LM, Grady C, Iltis AS, Sadler JZ, Wilfond BS. Points to consider: the research ethics consultation service and the IRB. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2009; 31(6): 1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter K, Danis M, Taylor HA, Cho M, Wilfond B. The state of clinical research ethics today: insights from a National Ethics Consultation Collaborative. American Journal of Bioethics 2018; 18(1): 39–45; p. 41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCormick JB, Sharp RR, Ottenberg AL, Reider CR, Taylor HA, Wilfond BS. The establishment of research ethics consultation services (RECS): an emerging research resource. Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(1): 40–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paquette ET, Ross L. The challenges of incorporating research ethics consultation into institutional human subjects protections programs. American Journal of Bioethics 2018; 18(1): 49–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho MK, Tobin SL, Greely HT, McCormick J, Boyce A, Magnus D. Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 2008; 8(3): 4–13. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources