Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines
- PMID: 36756105
- PMCID: PMC9902087
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751052
Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines
Abstract
Biren ParikhIntroduction Hormonal status and HER2 expression are valuable biomarkers and dictate the management of the patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (IBC). It is crucial to identify the patients who truly respond to anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines has recommended certain modifications in HER2 interpretation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with concomitant immunohistochemistry (IHC). Objectives We aimed to evaluate HER2 FISH interpretation in IBC with equivocal IHC results as per 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations and compare FISH results with hormonal receptor status. Materials and Methods FISH results of 502 cases of IBC with equivocal IHC report between January 2016 to January 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. FISH results were categorized according to ASCO/CAP guidelines 2018 into five respective groups. Results FISH testing in IHC equivocal cases showed 219 (43.6%) cases were classic amplified (positive) belonged to group 1, 217(43.2%) cases were classic nonamplified (negative) fell into group 5, 39 (7.8%) and 02 (0.4%) patients were in group 2 (negative) and group 3 (positive), and 25 (5.0%) cases were in group 4 (negative). About 52.1 and 49.3% of cases with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity were reported as HER2 positive. Among 502 cases, 25 equivocal cases according to the 2013 guidelines were redefined as HER2 negative and 02 (0.4%) cases reported positive were classified negative as per updated 2018 guidelines. Conclusion Revised 2018 guidelines is helpful in accurate identification of HER2 status and in avoiding targeted therapy in unwarranted cases. Updated 2018 guidelines has removed equivocal HER2-FISH category that has eliminated management dilemma in these cases. Only long-term clinical follow-up will establish the validity of the updated guidelines.
Keywords: ASCO/CAP guidelines 2018; FISH; HER2; equivocal; invasive breast cancer.
MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 May;175(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05148-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019. PMID: 30712197
-
Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 13;9(1):16726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53003-w. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31723206 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4397-z. Epub 2017 Jul 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28712009
-
Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0241775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241775. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33180796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.J Pathol Transl Med. 2020 Jan;54(1):34-44. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2019.11.03. Epub 2019 Nov 6. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 31693827 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Malvia S, Bagadi S A, Dubey U S, Saxena S. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(04):289–295. - PubMed
-
- American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists . Wolff A C, Hammond M E, Schwartz J N. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(01):18–43. - PubMed
-
- American Society of Clinical Oncology ; College of American Pathologists . Wolff A C, Hammond M E, Hicks D G. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3997–4013. - PubMed
-
- Wolff A C, Hammond M EH, Allison K H. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(11):1364–1382. - PubMed
-
- Liu Z H, Wang K, Lin D Y. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175(01):51–57. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous