Comparative effectiveness of various noninvasive local treatments in patients with epistaxis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
- PMID: 36757148
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.14680
Comparative effectiveness of various noninvasive local treatments in patients with epistaxis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The best initial strategy for managing epistaxis is unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the effectiveness of various noninvasive treatments for patients with epistaxis.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing immediate hemostasis, 2-day and 7-day rebleeding outcomes, as well as the use of noninvasive interventions for the treatment of epistaxis were selected. Frequentist NMA was performed.
Results: The systematic review included 20 RCTs (2994 participants) involving 12 different interventions. The NMA demonstrated that topical treatment with tranexamic acid (TXA) significantly reduced the odds of 2-day rebleeding compared with the control conservative treatment (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.61) and traditional anterior nasal packing (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.76). The sensitivity analysis yielded robust results, and the overall evidence was high. Topical TXA significantly reduced the odds of 7-day rebleeding compared with traditional nasal packing (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.70), with moderate evidence owing to the heterogeneous results. Despite the significant effects of topical TXA on achieving immediate hemostasis and Rapid Rhino nasal packing on preventing 2-day rebleeding compared to the control and traditional nasal packing, the evidence is low to very low due to heterogeneity, inconsistency, and within-study bias.
Conclusions: In the treatment of epistaxis, topical TXA may be superior to conservative treatment or traditional nasal packing, particularly in preventing 2-day rebleeding.
© 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Chaaban MR, Zhang D, Resto V, Goodwin JS. Demographic, seasonal, and geographic differences in emergency department visits for epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(1):81-86.
-
- Pallin DJ, Chng Y-M, McKay MP, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):77-81.
-
- Fishpool S, Tomkinson A. Patterns of hospital admission with epistaxis for 26,725 patients over an 18-year period in Wales, UK. Ann Roy Coll Surg. 2012;94(8):559-562.
-
- Seikaly H. Epistaxis. New Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):944-951.
-
- Meccariello G, Georgalas C, Montevecchi F, et al. Management of idiopathic epistaxis in adults: what's new? Acta Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;39(4):211-219.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources