Degree of conversion of 3D printing resins used for splints and orthodontic appliances under different postpolymerization conditions
- PMID: 36757463
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-04893-8
Degree of conversion of 3D printing resins used for splints and orthodontic appliances under different postpolymerization conditions
Abstract
Objectives: To measure the degree of conversion (DC) of different 3D printing resins used for splints or orthodontic appliances under different postpolymerization conditions.
Materials and methods: Five 3D-printed photopolymer resins were studied. Each resin was analyzed in liquid form (n = 15), and then cylindrical specimens (n = 135) were additively manufactured and postcured with Form Cure (Formlabs) at different times (10, 60, and 90 min) and temperatures (20 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C). The DC of each specimen was measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The data were statistically analyzed using a 3-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.
Results: The time and temperature of postpolymerization significantly influenced the DC of each resin: when time and/or temperature increased, the DC increased. For all resins tested, the lowest DC was obtained with a postcuring protocol at 10 min and 20 °C, and the highest DC was obtained at 90 min and 80 °C. However, at 80 °C, the samples showed a yellowish color.
Conclusions: With the Form Cure device, the time and temperature of postcuring could have an impact on the DC of the 3D printing resins studied. The DC of the 3D printing resins could be optimized by adjusting the postpolymerization protocol.
Clinical relevance: Regardless of the resin used, when using the Form Cure device, postcuring at 60 min and 60 °C would be the minimal time and temperature conditions for achieving proper polymerization. Beyond that, it would be preferable to increase the postcuring time to boost the DC.
Keywords: Degree of conversion; 3D printing resin.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Maspero C, Tartaglia G (2020) 3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: where we are and where we are going. Mater 13(22):5204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225204 - DOI
-
- Bartkowiak T, Walkowiak-Śliziuk A (2018) 3D printing technology in orthodontics – review of current applications. J Stoma 71(4):356–364. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2018.83410 - DOI
-
- Bagheri A, Jianyong J (2019) Photopolymerization in 3D printing. ACS Appl Polym Mater 1(4):593–611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00165 - DOI
-
- Hague R, Mansour S, Saleh N, Harris R (2004) Materials analysis of stereolithography resins for use in rapid manufacturing. J Mater Sci 39(7):2457–2464. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000020010.73768.4a - DOI
-
- Fuh JYH, Lu L, Tan CC, Shen ZX, Chew S (1999) Processing and characterising photo-sensitive polymer in the rapid prototyping process. J Mater Process Technol 89:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00073-4 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
