Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1041-1050.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euad016.

Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups

Serge Boveda et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: This study compares clinical outcomes between leadless pacemakers (leadless-VVI) and transvenous ventricular pacemakers (transvenous ventricular permanent-VVI) in subgroups of patients at higher risk of pacemaker complications.

Methods and results: This study is based on the Micra Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) study. Patients from the Micra CED study were considered in a high-risk subgroup if they had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease Stages 4-5 (CKD45), end-stage renal disease, malignancy, diabetes, tricuspid valve disease (TVD), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 12 months prior to pacemaker implant. A pre-specified set of complications and reinterventions were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Competing risks models were used to compare reinterventions and complications between leadless-VVI and transvenous-VVI patients within each subgroup; results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. A post hoc comparison of a composite outcome of reinterventions and device complications was conducted. Out of 27 991 patients, 9858 leadless-VVI and 12 157 transvenous-VVI patients have at least one high-risk comorbidity. Compared to transvenous-VVI patients, leadless-VVI patients in four subgroups [malignancy, HR 0.68 (0.48-0.95); diabetes, HR 0.69 (0.53-0.89); TVD, HR 0.60 (0.44-0.82); COPD, HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)] had fewer complications, in three subgroups [diabetes, HR 0.58 (0.37-0.89); TVD, HR 0.46 (0.28-0.76); COPD, HR 0.51 (0.29-0.90)) had fewer reinterventions, and in four subgroups (malignancy, HR 0.52 (0.32-0.83); diabetes, HR 0.52 (0.35-0.77); TVD, HR 0.44 (0.28-0.70); COPD, HR 0.55 (0.34-0.89)] had lower rates of the combined outcome.

Conclusion: In a real-world study, leadless pacemaker patients had lower 2-year complications and reinterventions rates compared with transvenous-VVI pacing in several high-risk subgroups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03039712.

Keywords: Complications; High-risk patients; Leadless pacemakers; System reintervention; Transvenous pacemakers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: S.B. is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Microport, and Zoll. M.F.E.-C. is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Biotronik. L.H., C.L., C.W., K.W., and K.S. are employees and shareholders of Medtronic.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Two-year chronic complications results. Notes: Hazard ratios of 2-year chronic complication rates between leadless-VVI patients and transvenous-VVI patients for each high-risk subgroup, estimated with Fine–Gray competing risk models. Spikes represent Bonferroni-adjusted confidence intervals (number of tests = 27). aDCSI, adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease. ESRD and CKD Stages 4 or 5 are not mutually exclusive.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two-year device-related reinterventions. Notes: Hazards ratios of 2-year device-related reintervention rates between leadless-VVI patients and transvenous-VVI patients for each high-risk subgroup, estimated with Fine–Gray competing risk models. Spikes represent Bonferroni-adjusted Confidence Intervals (number of tests = 9). aDCSI, adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; ESRD and CKD Stages 4 or 5 are not mutually exclusive.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Two-year combined device-related chronic complication and select reinterventions. Notes: hazards ratios of 2-year combined device-related chronic complications (device breakdown, dislodgment, other mechanical complications, infection, device-related pain, device-related stenosis, and pocket complications) and select reinterventions (system revision, lead revision or replacement, system replacement, system removal) rates between leadless-VVI patients and transvenous-VVI patients for each high-risk subgroup, estimated with Fine–Gray competing risk models. Spikes represent Bonferroni-adjusted confidence intervals (number of tests = 27). aDCSI, adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease. ESRD and CKD Stages 4 or 5 are not mutually exclusive.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sensitivity analysis results. Notes: Hazard ratios adjusted using overlapping weights. Confidence intervals adjusted for multiple comparisons (number of tests = 12). P-values of interactions are 0.0962 (chronic complications), 0.5408 (reinterventions), and 0.2319 (composite endpoint). High-risk comorbidities are chronic kidney disease Stages 4 and 5, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes with low adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index, diabetes with high adapted Diabetes Complication Severity Index, end-stage renal disease, malignancy with treatment, malignancy without treatment, and tricuspid valve disease. ESRD and CKD Stages 4 or 5 are not mutually exclusive. Conf. Int., confidence internal; HR, hazard ratio; L-VVI, leadless-VVI; TV-VVI, transvenous-VVI.

References

    1. Duray GZ, Ritter P, El-Chami M, Narasimhan C, Omar R, Tolosana JMet al. . Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-month results from the Micra transcatheter pacing study. Heart Rhythm 2017;14:702–9. - PubMed
    1. El-Chami MF, Al-Samadi F, Clementy N, Garweg C, Martinez-Sande JL, Piccini JPet al. . Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: a comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. Heart Rhythm 2018;15:1800–7. - PubMed
    1. CMS Manual System . Pub 100-03 Medicare National Coverage Determinations. National Coverage Determination (NCD20.8.4): Leadless Pacemakers. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (23 April 2021, date last accessed).
    1. Piccini JP, El-Chami M, Wherry K, Crossley GH, Kowal RC, Stromberg Ket al. . Contemporaneous comparison of outcomes among patients implanted with a leadless vs transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker. JAMA Cardiol 2021;6:1187–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Chami MF, Bockstedt L, Longacre C, Higuera L, Stromberg K, Crossley Get al. . Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up. Eur Heart J 2022;43:1207–15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding