Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb;116(2):44-64.
doi: 10.1177/01410768231152222. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi  1   2   3   4   5 , Sarah E Hughes  1   2   3   4   5 , John Devin Peipert  6 , Liv Marit Valen Schougaard  7 , Roger Wilson  1 , Melanie J Calvert  1   2   3   4   5   8
Affiliations
Review

Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes

Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi et al. J R Soc Med. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

The global demand for hospital treatment exceeds capacity.The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this issue, leading to increased backlogs and longer wait times for patients. The amount of outpatient attendances undertaken in many settings is still below pre-pandemic levels and this, combined with delayed referrals, means that patients are facing delays in treatment and poorer health outcomes. Use of digital health technologies, notably the use of remote symptom monitoring systems based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), may offer a solution to reduce outpatient waiting lists and tailor care to those in greatest need. Drawing on international examples, the authors explore the use of electronic PRO systems to triage clinical care. We summarise the key benefits of the approach and also highlight the challenges for implementation, which need to be addressed to promote equitable healthcare delivery.

Keywords: Effectiveness of care; Patient-reported outcomes; ePROs; long-term care; outpatient care; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. FDA. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medicinal Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, 2009.
    1. Calvert M, Kyte D, Price G, Valderas JM, et al. Hjollund NH. Maximising the impact of patient reported outcome assessment for patients and society. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2019; 364: k5267. - PubMed
    1. Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM, Petersen C, Holve E, Segal CD, et al.. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Affairs 2016; 35: 575–582. - PubMed
    1. Rotenstein LS, Huckman RS, Wagle NW. Making patients and doctors happier — the potential of patient-reported outcomes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1309–1312. - PubMed
    1. Schwartzberg L. Electronic patient-reported outcomes: the time is ripe for integration into patient care and clinical research. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016: 35: e89–e96. - PubMed

Publication types