Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care
- PMID: 36759132
- PMCID: PMC10961604
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220143R1
Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care
Abstract
Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) frequently address dermatologic concerns and perform skin examinations during clinical encounters. For PCPs who evaluate concerning skin lesions, dermoscopy (a noninvasive skin visualization technique) has been shown to increase the sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis compared with unassisted clinical examinations. Because no formal consensus existed on the fundamental knowledge and skills that PCPs should have with respect to dermoscopy for skin cancer detection, the objective of this study was to develop an expert consensus statement on proficiency standards for PCPs learning or using dermoscopy.
Methods: A 2-phase modified Delphi method was used to develop 2 proficiency standards. In the study's first phase, a focus group of PCPs and dermatologists generated a list of dermoscopic diagnoses and associated features. In the second phase, a larger panel evaluated the proposed list and determined whether each diagnosis was reflective of a foundational or intermediate proficiency or neither.
Results: Of the 35 initial panelists, 5 PCPs were lost to follow-up or withdrew; 30 completed the fifth and last round. The final consensus-based list contained 39 dermoscopic diagnoses and associated features.
Conclusions: This consensus statement will inform the development of PCP-targeted dermoscopy training initiatives designed to support early cancer detection.
Keywords: Continuing Medical Education; Delphi Method; Dermoscopy; Expert Opinion; Focus Groups; General Practitioners; Melanoma; Primary Care Physicians; Primary Health Care; Skin Cancer.
© Copyright by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: None.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care.J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Aug 9;36(4):695. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230138R0. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 37562835 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Feb 1;161(2):135-146. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382. JAMA Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39535756
-
Dermoscopy Proficiency Expectations for US Dermatology Resident Physicians: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey of Pigmented Lesion Experts.JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Feb 1;157(2):189-197. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5213. JAMA Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33404623 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 20;24(12):1877-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0864. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16622262 Clinical Trial.
-
Training Primary Care Physicians in Dermoscopy for Skin Cancer Detection: a Scoping Review.J Cancer Educ. 2020 Aug;35(4):643-650. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01647-7. J Cancer Educ. 2020. PMID: 31792723 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy for skin cancer detection.Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Mar;17(2):147-53. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000152627.36243.26. Curr Opin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15725920 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Dermoscopy Training on Diagnostic Accuracy, and Its Association With Biopsy and Referral Patterns Among Primary Care Providers: A Retrospective and Prospective Educational Intervention Study.J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241296625. doi: 10.1177/21501319241296625. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024. PMID: 39498620 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Utility of a Digital Dermoscopy Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Device in the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer by Dermatologists.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;16(21):3592. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213592. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518033 Free PMC article.
-
Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Feb 1;161(2):135-146. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.4382. JAMA Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39535756
-
Oregon primary care providers as a frontline defense in the War on Melanoma™: improving access to melanoma education.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 14;12:1427136. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1427136. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40160331 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA A Cancer J Clinicians 2022;72: 7–33. - PubMed
-
- Howlader NN, Krapcho M, Miller D, et al. editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2016 [Internet].2019. [cited 2021 July 1]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/.
-
- Glazer AM, Farberg AS, Winkelmann RR, Rigel DS. Analysis of trends in geographic distribution and density of US dermatologists. JAMA Dermatol 2017;153:322–5. - PubMed
-
- Vaidya T, Zubritsky L, Alikhan A, Housholder A. Socioeconomic and geographic barriers to dermatology care in urban and rural US populations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;78:406–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical