Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 29:91:169-197.
doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.91.84896. eCollection 2022.

Two new species of Calonectria (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) causing Eucalyptus leaf blight in Brazil

Affiliations

Two new species of Calonectria (Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) causing Eucalyptus leaf blight in Brazil

Enrique I Sanchez-Gonzalez et al. MycoKeys. .

Abstract

In recent decades, commercial Eucalyptus plantations have expanded toward the warm and humid regions of northern and northeastern Brazil, where Calonectria leaf blight (CLB) has become the primary fungal leaf disease of this crop. CLB can be caused by different Calonectria species, and previous studies have indicated that Calonectria might have high species diversity in Brazil. During a disease survey conducted in three commercial plantations of Eucalyptus in northeastern Brazil, diseased leaves from Eucalyptus trees with typical symptoms of CLB were collected, and Calonectria fungi were isolated. Based on phylogenetic analyses of six gene regions (act, cmdA, his3, rpb2, tef1, and tub2) and morphological characteristics, two new species of Calonectria were identified. Five isolates were named as C.paragominensis sp. nov. and four were named as C.imperata sp. nov. The pathogenicity to Eucalyptus of both species was confirmed by fulfilling the Koch's postulates.

Keywords: Cylindrocladium; GCPSR; phylogenetic network analysis; phylogeny.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree based on maximum likelihood analysis of concatenated act, cmdA, his3, rpb2, tef1 and tub2 gene regions. Bootstrap support values ≥ 80% for maximum parsimony (MP), Ultrafast bootstrap support values ≥ 95% for maximum likelihood (ML), and posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 from BI analyses are presented at the nodes (MP/ML/PP). Bootstrap values below 80% (MP), 95% (ML) and posterior probabilities below 0.80 are marked with “-”. Ex-type isolates are indicated by “▲”, isolates highlighted in bold were sequenced in this study, and novel species are in blue and orange. C.gracilipes was used as outgroup. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test for C.paragominensis and C.imperata. Phylogenetic networks constructed using the LogDet transformation and the NeighborNet method and displayed with the EqualAngle algorithm. Bootstrap support values > 80% are shown. Φw < 0.05 indicate significant recombination. New species described in this study are highlighted in bold, with blue (A) and orange (B) lines.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
CalonectriaparagominensisA, B macroconidiophore C lateral stipe extensions D, E conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform phialides F, G globose to sphaeropedunculate vesicles H, I one, two, and three-septate macroconidia. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
CalonectriaimperataA–C macroconidiophore D–G ellipsoidal to narrowly obpyriform vesicles H–J conidiogenous apparatus with conidiophore branches and doliiform to reniform phialides K, L macroconidia. Scale bars: 20 μm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Pathogenicity tests on leaves of Eucalyptus genotypes A, B surface and reverse of C.paragominensis on MEA plates after 14 days grown at 25 °C C, D surface and reverse of C.imperata on MEA plates after 14 days grown at 25 °C E, I lesions on leaves of E.grandis × E.brassiana induced by C.paragominensis 72 h after inoculation F, J lesions on leaves of E.urophylla induced by C.imperata 72 h after inoculation G, H, K no disease symptoms on leaves inoculated with sterile water (negative controls). Scale bars: 5 cm (E–K).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfenas AC, Zauza EAV, Mafia RG, de Assis TF. (2009) Clonagem e doenças do eucalipto. 2nd ed. , Editora UFV, Viçosa, MG, Brazil, 500 pp.
    1. Alfenas RF, Pereira OL, Freitas RG, Freitas CS, Dita MA, Alfenas AC. (2013) Mass spore production and inoculation of Calonectriapteridis on Eucalyptus spp. under different environmental conditions. Tropical Plant Pathology 38(5): 406–413. 10.1590/S1982-56762013000500005 - DOI
    1. Alfenas RF, Lombard L, Pereira OL, Alfenas AC, Crous PW. (2015) Diversity and potential impact of Calonectria species in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Studies in Mycology 80(1): 89–130. 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.11.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruen TC, Philippe H, Bryant D. (2006) A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172(4): 2665–2681. 10.1534/genetics.105.048975 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carbone I, Kohn LM. (1999) A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91(3): 553–556. 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources