Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 25:17:1077858.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1077858. eCollection 2023.

Cognitive impairment in diffuse axonal injury patients with favorable outcome

Affiliations

Cognitive impairment in diffuse axonal injury patients with favorable outcome

Weiliang Chen et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially the severe TBI are often followed by persistent cognitive sequalae, including decision-making difficulties, reduced neural processing speed and memory deficits. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is classified as one of the severe types of TBI. Part of DAI patients are marginalized from social life due to cognitive impairment, even if they are rated as favorable outcome. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the specific type and severity of cognitive impairment in DAI patients with favorable outcome.

Methods: The neurocognition of 46 DAI patients with favorable outcome was evaluated by the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC), and the differences in the domains of cognitive impairment caused by different grades of DAI were analyzed after data conversion of scores of nine cognitive domains of MoCA-BC by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results: Among the 46 DAI patients with favorable outcome, eight had normal cognitive function (MoCA-BC ≥ 26), and 38 had cognitive impairment (MoCA-BC < 26). The MoCA-BC scores were positively correlated with pupillary light reflex (r = 0.361, p = 0.014), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (r = 0.402, p = 0.006), and years of education (r = 0.581, p < 0.001). Return of consciousness (r = -0.753, p < 0.001), Marshall CT (r = -0.328, p = 0.026), age (r = -0.654, p < 0.001), and DAI grade (r = -0.403, p = 0.006) were found to be negatively correlated with the MoCA-BC scores. In patients with DAI grade 1, the actually deducted scores (Ads) of memory (r = 0.838, p < 0.001), abstraction (r = 0.843, p < 0.001), and calculation (r = 0.782, p < 0.001) were most related to the Ads of MoCA-BC. The Ads of nine cognitive domains and MoCA-BC were all proved to be correlated, among patients with DAI grade 2. However, In the DAI grade 3 patients, the highest correlation with the Ads of MoCA-BC were the Ads of memory (r = 0.904, p < 0.001), calculation (r = 0.799, p = 0.006), orientation (r = 0.801, p = 0.005), and executive function (r = 0.869, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: DAI patients with favorable outcome may still be plagued by cognitive impairment, and different grades of DAI cause different domains of cognitive impairment.

Keywords: Montreal cognitive assessment; cognitive domain; cognitive impairment; diffuse axonal injury; outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
DAI grade 1: Lesions in the hemispheres, DAI grade 2: Lesions in the corpus callosum, DAI grade 3: Lesions in the brainstem (as shown in the red circle). DAI, Diffuse axonal injury.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Relationship between potential risk factors and MoCA-BC scores. MoCA-BC, the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Pearson correlation analysis was performed between the Ads of nine cognitive domains and MoCA-BC after data conversion in different grades of DAI patients. MoCA-BC, the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic; DAI, Diffuse axonal injury.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams J. H., Doyle D., Ford I., Gennarelli T. A., Graham D. I., McLellan D. R. (1989). Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology 15 49–59. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benjamini D., Iacono D., Komlosh M. E., Perl D. P., Brody D. L., Basser P. J. (2021). Diffuse axonal injury has a characteristic multidimensional MRI signature in the human brain. Brain 144 800–816. 10.1093/brain/awaa447 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen K., Xu Y., Chu A., Ding D., Liang X., Nasreddine Z. S., et al. (2016). Validation of the Chinese version of montreal cognitive assessment basic for screening mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriat. Soc. 64 e285–e290. 10.1111/jgs.14530 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen W., Wang G., Yao C., Zhu Z., Chen R., Su W., et al. (2022). The ratio of serum neuron-specific enolase level to admission glasgow coma scale score is associated with diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurol. 13:887818. 10.3389/fneur.2022.887818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornea A., Simu M., Rosca E. C. (2022). Montreal cognitive assessment for evaluating cognitive impairment in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review. J. Clin. Med. 11:4679. 10.3390/jcm11164679 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources