Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022;15(4):343-359.
doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v15i4.2496.

Accurate laboratory diagnosis of human intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis

Affiliations
Review

Accurate laboratory diagnosis of human intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis

Hossein Hooshyar et al. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2022.

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica is important, as it is known as a causative agent for both invasive intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis. Amoebiasis has a worldwide distribution, especially in developing countries, and it is responsible for up to 100,000 fatal cases annually. A number of diagnostic methods, including microscopy, culture, antigen detection, molecular based methods, and serological assays have been proposed to assist in diagnosing amoebiasis. The present study aimed to gather new data and review the available diagnostic tests of both intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis and to highlight pitfalls and challenges of each of them. A broad literature of electronic databases was conducted and covered articles published up to March 2022. For laboratory diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis, direct microscopy stool examinations and cultures should be held as the high-performance diagnostic strategies. Molecular and immunological-based assays are also recommended as complementary tests. To diagnose extra-intestinal infection, the use of serological tests is still considered the method of choice. However, serodiagnosis requires further improvement for the accurate differential diagnosis of active infection from past infections.

Keywords: Amoebiasis; Conventional methods; Diagnostic tests; Entamoeba histolytica; Molecular tests.; Serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mohammad FI. A general review on the amoebiasis. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2019;10:479–83.
    1. Jamali S, Khan S, Parvez M. Intestinal Amoebiasis and risk factors associated with its transmission among paediatric patients attending a tertiary health care facility in northern India. National J lab Med. 2019;8:M004–M007.
    1. Akhtar T, Khan AG, Ahmed I, Nazli R, Haider J. Prevalence of amoebiasis in a model research community and its confirmation using stool antigen elisa for Entamoeba histolytica. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2016;29:1587–90. - PubMed
    1. Flores MS, Carrillo P, Tamez E, Rangel R, Rodríguez EG, Maldonado MG, et al. Diagnostic parameters of serological ELISA for invasive amoebiasis, using antigens preserved without enzymatic inhibitors. Exp parasitol. 2016;161:48–53. - PubMed
    1. Hooshyar H, Rostamkhani P, Rezaeian M. An annotated checklist of the human and animal entamoeba (Amoebida: Endamoebidae) species-a review article. Iranian J Parasitol. 2015;10:146–156. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources