Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):7964-7989.
doi: 10.1177/08862605231153873. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations

Bailey M Fraser  1 , Emily Pica  2 , Joanna D Pozzulo  1
Affiliations

Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations

Bailey M Fraser et al. J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Reports of sexual offences have increased in recent years, with many cases involving allegations against high-status individuals (e.g., Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby). In addition, many of these cases have involved allegations against the defendant from multiple victims, with long delays in reporting of the alleged assault. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of defendant occupational status (low vs. high), defendant race (White, Black), number of allegations (one vs. five victims), and the length of reporting delay (5, 20, or 35 years) on mock-juror decision-making. Mock-jurors (N = 752) read a mock-trial transcript describing a sexual assault case. After reading the trial transcript, mock-jurors were asked to provide dichotomous and continuous guilt ratings, as well as ratings regarding their perceptions of the defendant and victim. Results revealed that mock-jurors rendered more guilty verdicts, assigned higher guilt ratings, and perceived the defendant less favorably and the victim more favorably, when the defendant was White (as opposed to Black) and when there were multiple allegations against the defendant. The current findings suggest that defendant race and the number of allegations are highly influential in the context of a sexual assault case.

Keywords: adult victims; mock-juror decision-making; race; reporting/disclosure; sexual assault; status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Balogh D. W., Kite M. E., Pickel K. L., Canel D., Schroeder J. (2003). The effects of delayed report and motive for reporting on perceptions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 48, 337–348. 10.1023/A:1022990530657 - DOI
    1. Bitter A. N., Smith O. K. H., Michalski N. D., Freng S. (2022). Examining the crossover interaction of the race-crime congruency effect: A systematic review. Race and Social Problems, 1–20. 10.1007/s12552-022-09376-1 - DOI
    1. Bornstein B. H., Golding J. M., Neuschatz J., Kimbrough C., Reed K., Magyarics C., Luecht K. (2017). Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 41(1), 13. 10.1037/lhb0000223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bottoms B. L., Davis S. L., Epstein M. A. (2004). Effects of victim and defendant race on jurors’ decisions in child sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 1–33.
    1. Bruer K., Pozzulo J.D. (2014). Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision-making. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 332–348. 10.1111/lcrp.12001 - DOI