Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;12(3):891-917.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00762-9. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

The Use and Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Real-World Clinical Practice: EZTEAM Study

Affiliations

The Use and Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Real-World Clinical Practice: EZTEAM Study

Alex Soriano et al. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Ceftazidime-avibactam has proven activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in clinical trials and real-world studies. This study was conducted to describe the patterns of use of ceftazidime-avibactam (including indications and associated antibiotics), and the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: This non-interventional medical chart review study was conducted in 11 countries across the European and Latin American (LATAM) regions. Consecutive patients treated in clinical practice with at least one dose of ceftazidime-avibactam for an approved indication per country label since 01 January 2018 (or launch date in the country if posterior) were enrolled. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 h.

Results: Of the 569 eligible patients enrolled, 516 (90.7%) were treated for at least 72 h (354 patients from Europe and 162 patients from LATAM); 390 patients (75.7%) had switched from another antibiotic line for Gram-negative coverage. Infection sources were intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory, bloodstream infections, and other infections (approximately 20% each). K. pneumoniae was the most common microorganism identified in the latest microbiological evaluation before starting ceftazidime-avibactam (59.3%). Two-thirds of microorganisms tested for susceptibility were MDR, of which 89.3% were carbapenem-resistant. The common MDR mechanisms for K. pneumoniae were carbapenemase (33.9%), oxacillinase 48 (25.2%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (21.5%), or metallo-beta-lactamase (14.2%) production. Without prior patient exposure, 17 isolates (mostly K. pneumoniae) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Treatment success was achieved in 77.3% of patients overall (88.3% among patients with urinary infection), regardless of first or second treatment line. In-hospital mortality rate was 23.1%. Adverse events were reported for six of the 569 patients enrolled.

Conclusion: This study provides important real-world evidence on treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice through its recruitment in the European and LATAM regions. Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the antibiotics to consider for treatment of MDR bacteria.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03923426.

Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Ceftazidime–avibactam; Europe; Intra-abdominal infection; K. pneumoniae; LATAM; Multidrug-resistant; Respiratory infection; Urinary infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. 1Indicates outcome that was examined for patients exposed to ceftazidime–avibactam for ≥ 72 h. 2Information about hospital readmissions or death after hospital discharge not available via medical chart abstraction was ascertained by contacting the patient or their legal representative by phone > 60 days after hospital discharge. † Patients followed from ceftazidime–avibactam initiation until 60 days after hospital discharge or another censoring event (in-hospital death, withdrawal from the study, or loss-to-follow-up, whichever occurs first). Data had been abstracted from patient medical charts. Note: Data collection began 01 Jan 2018 or since the date of the launch if after 01 Jan 2018

References

    1. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228–241. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Larizgoitia I, Prasopa-Plaizier N, Jha AK. Global priorities for patient safety research. BMJ. 2009;338:b1775. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1775. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zarb P, Coignard B, Griskeviciene J, et al. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) pilot point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use. Euro Surveill. 2012. 10.2807/ese.17.46.20316-en. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organizations. Annual epidemiological report on communicable disease in Europe. 2008. https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/media/en/publications/Publicat.... Accessed 22 Feb 2018.
    1. Annual epidemiological report Reporting on 2011 surveillance data and 2012 epidemic intelligence data. 2013. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Pub.... Accessed 21 Oct 2021.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources