Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):e059528.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059528.

Exploring what is important during burn recovery: a qualitative study investigating priorities of patients and healthcare professionals over time

Affiliations

Exploring what is important during burn recovery: a qualitative study investigating priorities of patients and healthcare professionals over time

Christin Hoffmann et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to investigate: (1) priorities of patients and healthcare professionals during recovery from a burn injury, (2) how priorities change over time and (3) how priorities map to outcomes currently reported in burns research.

Design: Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

Setting, participants: A total of 53 patients and healthcare professionals were recruited from four National Health Service (NHS) burn services across England and Wales across England and Wales. Patient participants (n=32) included adults, adolescents and parents of paediatric patients, with a variety of burn injuries in terms of severity and cause of burn injury. Healthcare professionals (n=21) were NHS staff members involved in burn care and included professionals with a range of clinical experience and roles (eg, nurses, surgeons, occupational therapists, physiotherapist, administration).

Results: Ten themes relating to priorities (outcomes) during recovery from a burn injury were identified for patients and professionals. Of those, six were identified for patients and professionals ('pain and discomfort', 'psychological well-being', 'healing', 'scarring', 'function', 'infection'), three were unique to professionals ('patient knowledge, understanding and support', 'sense of control', 'survival') and one was unique to patients ('uncertainty'). Results highlighted that importance of these priorities changes over time (eg, 'survival' was only a concern in the short term). Likewise, priorities differed between patients and professionals (eg, 'pain' was important to patients throughout their recovery, but not for professionals). Seven out of 10 themes overlapped with outcomes commonly assessed in burn research.

Conclusion: Professionals' and patients' priorities (important outcomes) change over time after burn injury and differ between those groups. Burn care research should consider measuring outcomes at different time points during the recovery from a burn injury to accurately reflect complexity of burn recovery.

Keywords: Clinical trials; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of patients' and professionals' priorities over time.

References

    1. NHS Digital . HES data dictionary: admitted patient care. 2019.
    1. NHS England . NHS standard contract for specialised burns care (all ages). 2013. Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/d06-spec-burn-care... [Accessed 5 Jun 2021].
    1. Falder S, Browne A, Edgar D, et al. . Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: a clinical overview. Burns 2009;35:618–41. 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown T, Mills S, Muller M. If it ca ’’t be measured it ca’n’t be managed. the paucity of outcome measures in burn care. Burns 2003;29:757. 10.1016/j.burns.2003.09.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemon J, Cooper J, Defres S, et al. . Understanding parental perspectives on outcomes following paediatric encephalitis: a qualitative study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220042. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types