Tumor Regression Grade and Overall Survival following Gastrectomy with Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer
- PMID: 36765008
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13151-w
Tumor Regression Grade and Overall Survival following Gastrectomy with Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Background: Pre-/perioperative chemotherapy is well-established for management of locoregional gastric cancer (LRGC). The American Joint Committee on Cancer advocates histopathologic assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) but does not endorse a specific schema. We sought to examine the prognostic value of the recently revised National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) definition of TRG specifying TRG0 as no disease in primary tumor or lymph nodes.
Patients and methods: Patients with clinical-stage T2+/N+/M0 LRGC receiving preoperative chemotherapy and curative-intent gastrectomy were identified (2000-2020). TRG using the current NCCN definition was retrospectively assigned. Factors associated with TRG were examined using ordinal logistic regression and overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.
Results: Among 117 patients, the most common chemotherapy regimen was epirubicin, cisplatin, plus fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) (n = 48, 41%), followed by folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (n = 30, 26%), and fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, plus docetaxel (FLOT) (n = 13, 11%). TRG3 was the most common histopathologic response (n = 68, 58%), followed by TRG2 (n = 25, 21%), TRG1 (n = 18, 15%), and, lastly, TRG0 (n = 6, 5.1%). The only preoperative factor independently associated with lower TRG was gastroesophageal junction tumor location (OR 0.24, p = 0.012). Higher TRG was independently associated with worse OS in a stepwise fashion (HR 1.49, p = 0.026). Posttreatment pathologic lymph node status was the strongest prognostic factor (HR 1.93, p = 0.026). Independent prognostic value of TRG and ypT stage could not be shown due to substantial overlap.
Conclusions: TRG using the contemporary NCCN definition is associated with OS in LRGC. TRG0 is uncommon but with excellent prognosis. ypN status is the strongest prognostic factor and the revised NCCN definition acknowledging this is appropriate.
© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Comment in
-
ASO Author Reflections: Toward a Universal Definition of Tumor Regression Grade in Gastric Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3590-3591. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13173-4. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36723724 No abstract available.
References
-
- Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa055531 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neves Filho EH, de Sant’Ana RO, Nunes LV, Pires AP, da Cunha MD. Histopathological regression of gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: a critical review. APMIS. 2017;125(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12642 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: xontinuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9. - DOI
-
- Westerhoff M, Osecky M, Langer R. Varying practices in tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy: results of an international survey. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(4):676–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0393-7 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
