Poor Mobilizers in Lymphoma but Not Myeloma Patients Had Significantly Poorer Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Large Retrospective, Single-Center Observational Study
- PMID: 36765566
- PMCID: PMC9913576
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030608
Poor Mobilizers in Lymphoma but Not Myeloma Patients Had Significantly Poorer Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Large Retrospective, Single-Center Observational Study
Abstract
In our single-center study, 357 myeloma and lymphoma patients between 2009 and 2019 were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF 7.5 µg/kg bid for four days) plus a fixed dose of 24 mg Plerixafor when indicated (Plerixafor Group, n = 187) or G-CSF alone (G-CSF Group, n = 170). The target CD34 cell yields were ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in lymphoma and ≥4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in myeloma patients to enable putative second transplants in the latter. There were no significant differences in engraftment kinetics or transfusion requirements between the Plerixafor Group and the control group in the myeloma cohort, with lymphoma patients not requiring Plerixafor showing significantly faster neutrophil recovery, a trend to faster platelet recovery, and a significantly lower need for platelet transfusions, probably due to the significantly lower number of CD34-positive cells re-transfused. While in myeloma patients the outcome (overall survival, progression-free survival) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was similar between the Plerixafor Group and the control group, hard to mobilize lymphoma patients had significantly poorer progression-free survival (47% vs. 74% at 36 months after ASCT, p = 0.003) with a trend also to poorer overall survival (71% vs. 84%). In conclusion, while there seem to be no differences in stemness capacity and long-term engraftment efficiency between the Plerixafor and the G-CSF Group in lymphoma as well as myeloma patients, poor mobilizing lymphoma patients per se constitute a high-risk population with a poorer outcome after ASCT. Whether disease characteristics and/or a more intense or stem cell-toxic pre-mobilization chemo-/radiotherapy burden in this cohort are responsible for this observation remains to be shown in future studies.
Keywords: Plerixafor; autologous stem cell transplantation; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; lymphoma; multiple myeloma; poor mobilizer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Plerixafor and granulocyte colony stimulating factor for poor mobilizers in patients undergoing autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Single institution study.Front Transplant. 2023 Jan 18;1:1017579. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2022.1017579. eCollection 2022. Front Transplant. 2023. PMID: 38994380 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of mobilizing large numbers of CD34 + cells (super-mobilizers) on the engraftment and survival in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Dec;62(6):103787. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103787. Epub 2023 Aug 29. Transfus Apher Sci. 2023. PMID: 37704508
-
Plerixafor: a review of its use in stem-cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma.Drugs. 2011 Aug 20;71(12):1623-47. doi: 10.2165/11206040-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21861545 Review.
-
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012. PMID: 22683613 Clinical Trial.
-
[Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with plerixafor in poor mobilizer patients].Med Clin (Barc). 2016 Sep 2;147(5):223.e1-223.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.05.019. Epub 2016 Jun 30. Med Clin (Barc). 2016. PMID: 27374031 Spanish.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Fluorination on the Design of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors.Molecules. 2023 Feb 19;28(4):1973. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041973. Molecules. 2023. PMID: 36838960 Free PMC article. Review.
-
G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2329140. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2329140. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Ann Med. 2024. PMID: 38470973 Free PMC article.
-
CD34+ Cell Mobilization, Autograft Cellular Composition and Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients.Transfus Med Hemother. 2023 Aug 23;50(5):428-437. doi: 10.1159/000531799. eCollection 2023 Oct. Transfus Med Hemother. 2023. PMID: 37899989 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with etoposide +cytarabine plus G-CSF in poor mobilizers with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 18;15:1439253. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1439253. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39091501 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dhakal B., Szabo A., Chabra S., Hamadani M., D’Souza A., Usmani S., Sieracki R., Gyawali B., Jackson J., Asimakopoulos F., et al. Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agent Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:343–350. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4600. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gay F., Engelhardt M., Terpos E., Wäsch R., Giaccone L., Auner H., Caers J., Gramatzki M., van de Donk N., Oliva S., et al. From Transplant to Novel Cellular Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: European Myeloma Network Guidelines and Future Perspectives. Haematologica. 2018;103:197–211. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.174573. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources