Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 31;13(3):494.
doi: 10.3390/ani13030494.

Soybean Replacement by Alternative Protein Sources in Pig Nutrition and Its Effect on Meat Quality

Affiliations
Review

Soybean Replacement by Alternative Protein Sources in Pig Nutrition and Its Effect on Meat Quality

Silvia Parrini et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Soybean is one of the most expensive and limiting feed ingredients in diet formulations; however, in pig farming, it represents the main source of protein. The production and supply of soybean are critical steps due to their environmental impact and feed/food competition for land use. Therefore, research is focusing on finding alternatives to replace soybean partially or totally. However, alternative ingredients should ensure similar growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics compared to conventional soybean-based diets. The objective of this review was to evaluate the impact of different alternative protein sources to soybean in pig nutrition and their effects on growth performance, carcass, and meat quality traits. The review process was performed on Scopus®, and it considered research findings published from 2012 to the present on the Sus scrofa species. Articles without a control group fed with soybean were discarded. The main alternative protein sources identified were other legumes and distillers' dried grain with solubles (fish and animal proteins, oilseed by- and co-products). Interesting innovative protein sources included by-products from other industries (residues), microalgae and insects. Nevertheless, in dietary formulations, close attention must be paid to address the nutritional requirements, balance the supply of amino acids, avoid anti-nutritional or toxic compounds occasionally present in alternative protein sources, as well as determine the availability of protein feed in specific geographical areas.

Keywords: algae; fatty acids; fava bean; feed; insect meal; pea; performance; pork; swine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Corn distillers’ dried grain with solubles [68].

References

    1. Parisi G., Tulli F., Fortina R., Marino R., Bani P., Zotte A.D., De Angelis A., Piccolo G., Pinotti L., Schiavone A., et al. Protein hunger of the feed sector: The alternatives offered by the plant world. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2020;19:1204–1225. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1827993. - DOI
    1. Reckmann K., Blank R., Traulsen I., Krieter J. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of pork using different protein sources in pig feed. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2016;59:27–36. doi: 10.5194/aab-59-27-2016. - DOI
    1. Mungkung R., Aubin J., Prihadi T.H., Slembrouck J., van der Werf H.M., Legendre M. Life Cycle Assessment for environmentally sustainable aquaculture management: A case study of combined aquaculture systems for carp and tilapia. J. Clean. Prod. 2013;57:249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.029. - DOI
    1. Nijdam D., Rood T., Westhoek H. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy. 2012;37:760–770. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002. - DOI
    1. Alexandratos N., Bruinsma J. ESA Working Papers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Rome, Italy: 2012. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision; p. 154.

LinkOut - more resources