Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 28;13(3):483.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030483.

Can We Apply Snyder's Arthroscopic Classification to Ultrasound for Evaluating Rotator Cuff Tears? A Comparative Study with MR Arthrography

Affiliations

Can We Apply Snyder's Arthroscopic Classification to Ultrasound for Evaluating Rotator Cuff Tears? A Comparative Study with MR Arthrography

Marco Porta et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

We aimed to demonstrate the applicability of Snyder's arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff tears (RCT) in shoulder ultrasound (US) and to compare it with MR arthrography (MRA). Forty-six patients (34 males; mean age:34 ± 14 years) underwent shoulder US and MRA. Two radiologists (R1 = 25 years of experience; R2 = 2 years of experience) assigned A1-4, B1-4, or C1-4 values depending on the extent of RCT in both US and MRA. Inter-reader intra-modality and intra-reader inter-modality agreement were calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. US sensitivity and specificity of both readers were calculated using MRA as the gold standard. Patients were divided into intact cuff vs. tears, mild (A1/B1) vs. moderate (A2-3/B2-3) tears, mild-moderate (A2/B2) vs. high-moderate (A3/B3) cuff tears, moderate (A2-3/B2-3) vs. advanced (A4/B4) and full-thickness (C) tears. The highest agreement values in inter-reader US evaluation were observed for mild-moderate vs. high-moderate RCT (K = 0.745), in inter-reader MRA evaluation for mild vs. moderate RCT (K = 0.821), in R1 inter-modality (US-MRA) for mild-moderate vs. high-moderate and moderate vs. advanced/full-thickness RCT (K = 1.000), in R2 inter-modality (US-MRA) for moderate vs. advanced/full-thickness RCT (K = 1.000). US sensitivity ranged from 88.89%(R1)-84.62%(R2) to 100% (both readers), while specificity from 77.78%(R1)-90.00%(R2) to 100% (both readers). Snyder's classification can be used in US to ensure the correct detection and characterization of RCT.

Keywords: Snyder’s classification; magnetic resonance arthrography; rotator cuff tears; shoulder; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
US images on the long axis (A) and short axis (B), coronal T1-weighted (C), and sagittal T1-weighted (D) MRA images of a 57-year-old male patient with complete supraspinatus tendon rupture.

References

    1. Ruotolo C., Nottage W.M. Surgical and nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:527–531. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.31707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tashjian R.Z. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin. Sports Med. 2012;31:589–604. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Audigé L., Blum R., Müller A.M., Flury M., Durchholz H. Complications Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: A Systematic Review of Terms and Definitions with Focus on Shoulder Stiffness. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2015;3:2325967115587861. doi: 10.1177/2325967115587861. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Serpi F., Albano D., Rapisarda S., Chianca V., Sconfienza L.M., Messina C. Shoulder ultrasound: Current concepts and future perspectives. J. Ultrason. 2021;21:e154–e161. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albano D., Chianca V., Zappia M., Russo R., Romano S., Sconfienza L.M., di Pietto F. Imaging of Usual and Unusual Complication of Rotator Cuff Repair. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2019;43:359–366. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000846. - DOI - PubMed