Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;13(3):532.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030532.

Evaluation of Blood Biomarkers and Parameters for the Prediction of Stroke Survivors' Functional Outcome upon Discharge Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning

Affiliations

Evaluation of Blood Biomarkers and Parameters for the Prediction of Stroke Survivors' Functional Outcome upon Discharge Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning

Aimilios Gkantzios et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite therapeutic advancements, stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability. The quality of current stroke prognostic models varies considerably, whereas prediction models of post-stroke disability and mortality are restricted by the sample size, the range of clinical and risk factors and the clinical applicability in general. Accurate prognostication can ease post-stroke discharge planning and help healthcare practitioners individualize aggressive treatment or palliative care, based on projected life expectancy and clinical course. In this study, we aimed to develop an explainable machine learning methodology to predict functional outcomes of stroke patients at discharge, using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as a binary classification problem. We identified 35 parameters from the admission, the first 72 h, as well as the medical history of stroke patients, and used them to train the model. We divided the patients into two classes in two approaches: "Independent" vs. "Non-Independent" and "Non-Disability" vs. "Disability". Using various classifiers, we found that the best models in both approaches had an upward trend, with respect to the selected biomarkers, and achieved a maximum accuracy of 88.57% and 89.29%, respectively. The common features in both approaches included: age, hemispheric stroke localization, stroke localization based on blood supply, development of respiratory infection, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) upon admission and systolic blood pressure levels upon admission. Intubation and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels upon admission are additional features for the first approach and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) levels upon admission for the second. Our results suggest that the said factors may be important predictors of functional outcomes in stroke patients.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; blood biomarkers; clinical data; explainability; functional outcome; poststroke disability; prognosis; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Workflow of the proposed methodology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Learning curves based on the testing performance of the first approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Confusion matrix for RF model at eight features.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Learning curves based on the testing performance of second approach.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Confusion matrix for SVM model at seven features.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Biomarkers’ impact on RF model output for the prediction of mRS at independent vs. non-independent task.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Biomarkers’ impact on MLP model output for the prediction of mRS at disability vs. non-disability task.

References

    1. Donkor E.S. Stroke in the 21st century: A snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res. Treat. 2018;2018:3238165. doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roth G.A., Mensah G.A., Johnson C.O., Addolorato G., Ammirati E., Baddour L.M., Barengo N.C., Beaton A.Z., Benjamin E.J., Benziger C.P., et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin E.J., Virani S.S., Callaway C.W., Chamberlain A.M., Chang A.R., Cheng S., Chiuve S.E., Cushman M., Delling F.N., Deo R., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67–e492. - PubMed
    1. Christidi F., Tsiptsios D., Sousanidou A., Karamanidis S., Kitmeridou S., Karatzetzou S., Aitsidou S., Tsamakis K., Psatha E.A., Karavasilis E., et al. The Clinical Utility of Leukoaraiosis as a Prognostic Indicator in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Neurol. Int. 2022;14:952–980. doi: 10.3390/neurolint14040076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu M., Amarilla Vallejo A., Cantalapiedra Calvete C., Rudd A., Wolfe C., O’Connell M.D.L., Douiri A. Stroke Outcomes in Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Stroke. 2022;53:3072–3081. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037829. - DOI - PubMed