Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1684.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031684.

Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Coping Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship with Psychological Morbidity after Genetic Test Result Disclosure: Results from Cancer-Unaffected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Anna Isselhard et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Women who are found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant experience psychological distress due to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They may decide between different preventive options. In this secondary analysis of data collected alongside a larger randomized controlled trial, we are looking at 130 newly found BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and how their coping self-efficacy immediately after genetic test result disclosure is related to their psychological burden and status of preventive decision making. Participants received the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Impact of Event Scale, the Decisional Conflict Scale, and the Stage of Decision-Making Scale after positive genetic test result disclosure. We found that women with higher coping self-efficacy showed fewer symptoms of anxiety or depression and were less affected by receiving the genetic test result in terms of post-traumatic stress. However, coping self-efficacy had no relationship with any decision-related criteria, such as decisional conflict or stage of decision making. This shows that despite its buffering capacity on psychological burden, possessing coping self-efficacy does not lead to more decisiveness in preference-sensitive decisions.

Keywords: BRCA1; BRCA2; anxiety; breast cancer; psychological burden; self-efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Friedenson B. The BRCA1/2 pathway prevents hematologic cancers in addition to breast and ovarian cancers. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-152. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuchenbaecker K.B., Hopper J.L., Barnes D.R., Phillips K.-A., Mooij T.M., Roos-Blom M.-J., Jervis S., van Leeuwen F.E., Milne R.L., Andrieu N. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317:2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Underhill M.L., Crotser C.B. Seeking Balance: Decision Support Needs of Women Without Cancer and a Deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation. J. Genet. Couns. 2013;23:350–362. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9667-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nazarali S.A., Narod S.A. Tamoxifen for women at high risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2014;6:29–36. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S43763. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins J.M., Isaacs C. Management of breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who are unaffected with cancer. Breast J. 2020;26:1520–1527. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13970. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types