Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 22;24(3):2185.
doi: 10.3390/ijms24032185.

Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis

Affiliations
Review

Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis

Brock E Boehm et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

In the United States, prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. CaP is predominantly indolent at diagnosis, with a small fraction (25-30%) representing an aggressive subtype (Gleason score 7-10) that is prone to metastatic progression. This fact, coupled with the criticism surrounding the role of prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer screening, demonstrates the current need for a biomarker(s) that can identify clinically significant CaP and avoid unnecessary biopsy procedures and psychological implications of being diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Although several diagnostic biomarkers are available to clinicians, very few comparative trials have been performed to assess the clinical effectiveness of these biomarkers. It is of note, however, that a majority of these clinical trials have been over-represented by men of Caucasian origin, despite the fact that African American men have a 1.7 times higher incidence and 2.1 times higher rate of mortality from prostate cancer. Biomarkers for CaP diagnosis based on the tissue of origin include urine-based gene expression assays (PCA3, Select MDx, ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore, Mi-Prostate Score, PCA3-PCGEM1 gene panel), blood-based protein biomarkers (4K, PHI), and tissue-based DNA biomarker (Confirm MDx). Another potential direction that has emerged to aid in the CaP diagnosis include multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), which in conjunction with clinically validated biomarkers may provide a better approach to predict clinically significant CaP at diagnosis. In this review, we discuss some of the adjunctive biomarker tests along with newer imaging modalities that are currently available to help clinicians decide which patients are at risk of having high-grade CaP on prostate biopsy with the emphasis on clinical utility of the tests across African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men.

Keywords: biomarkers; diagnosis; prostate cancer; race.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of traditional and proposed mpMRI-molecular-biomarker-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. CaP, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate serum antigen; DRE, digital rectal examination; mpMRI, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Text color of FDA/CLIA-approved molecular markers represents tissue of origin: yellow—urine derived; red—blood derived; brown—tissue derived.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeSantis C.E., Mph K.D.M., Sauer A.G., Jemal A., Siegel R.L. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:211–233. doi: 10.3322/caac.21555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andriole G.L., Crawford E.D., Grubb R.L., 3rd, Buys S.S., Chia D., Church T.R., Fouad M.N., Gelmann E.P., Kvale P.A., Reding D.J., et al. Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:1310–1319. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schröder F.H., Hugosson J., Roobol M.J., Tammela T.L.J., Ciatto S., Nelen V., Kwiatkowski M., Lujan M., Lilja H., Zappa M., et al. Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:981–990. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Negoita S., Feuer E.J., Mariotto A., Cronin K.A., Petkov V.I., Ms S.K.H., Benard V., Henley S.J., Anderson R.N., Fedewa S., et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part II: Recent changes in prostate cancer trends and disease characteristics. Cancer. 2018;124:2801–2814. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances