Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 20;12(3):843.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12030843.

The Emerging Role of Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Procedural Sedation and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

The Emerging Role of Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Procedural Sedation and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

Rita Hitching et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse events associated with sedation outside of the operating room. Non-pharmacologic techniques are increasingly being used as peri-operative adjuncts to facilitate and promote anxiolysis, analgesia and sedation, and to reduce adverse events. This narrative review will briefly explore the emerging role of immersive reality in the peri-procedural care of surgical patients. Immersive virtual reality (VR) is intended to distract patients with the illusion of "being present" inside the computer-generated world, drawing attention away from their anxiety, pain, and discomfort. VR has been described for a variety of procedures that include colonoscopies, venipuncture, dental procedures, and burn wound care. As VR technology develops and the production costs decrease, the role and application of VR in clinical practice will expand. It is important for medical professionals to understand that VR is now available for prime-time use and to be aware of the growing body in the literature that supports VR.

Keywords: analgesia; anesthesia; non-pharmacologic; sedation; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A pediatric burn patient using VR analgesia during a painful medical procedure. Photo and copyright Hunter Hoffman, www.vrpain.com accessed on 28 November 2022.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Some VR systems have been customized to be used during wound care during wound debridement. Some patients have face or head burns that cause it to be difficult to wear traditional head-mounted VR goggles. The “articulated arm” shown above holds the goggles near the patient’s eyes, with little or no contact with the patient [35]. Photo and copyright Hunter Hoffman, www.vrpain.com, accessed on 28 November 2022.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The most recent version of SnowWorld, image by Ari Hollander and Howard Rose, copyright Hunter Hoffman, www.vrpain.com, accessed on 28 November 2022. SnowWorld is the first immersive virtual reality world specifically designed for pain reduction. www.vrpain.com, accessed on 28 November 2022.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Above right is a photo of the Meta Quest2 VR helmet. This lightweight helmet weighs only 17.7 ounces, is wireless, and uses cameras to optically track head and hand movements. Image on left shows a screenshot from an optically hand-tracked game named Waltz of the Wizard, aldin.com, accessed on 28 November 2022, photo on right by Hunter Hoffman, both images copyright Hunter Hoffman, www.vrpain.com, accessed on 28 November 2022.

References

    1. Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology. 2018;128:437–479. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams M.R., Nayshtut M., Hoefnagel A., McKeown A., Carlson D.W., Cravero J., Lightdale J., Mason K.P., Wilson S., Turk D.C., et al. Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An. ACTTION Systematic Review. Anesth. Analg. 2018;126:956–967. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habre W., Disma N., Virag K., Becke K., Hansen T.G., Johr M., Leva B., Morton N.S., Vermeulen P.M., Zielinska M., et al. Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia (APRICOT): A prospective multicentre observational study in 261 hospitals in Europe. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017;5:412–425. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30116-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roback M.G., Green S.M., Andolfatto G., Leroy P.L., Mason K.P. Tracking and Reporting Outcomes of Procedural Sedation (TROOPS): Standardized Quality Improvement and Research Tools from the International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation. Br. J. Anaesth. 2018;120:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Useful Medications for Oral Conditions. [(accessed on 10 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.aapd.org/