Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1041.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12031041.

The Correlation between the Results of the Sniffin' Sticks Test, Demographic Data, and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders in a Hungarian Population after a SARS-CoV-2 Infection

András Molnár  1 , Stefani Maihoub  1 , Panayiota Mavrogeni  2 , Magdolna Krasznai  1 , László Tamás  1   3 , Helga Kraxner  1
Affiliations

The Correlation between the Results of the Sniffin' Sticks Test, Demographic Data, and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders in a Hungarian Population after a SARS-CoV-2 Infection

András Molnár et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: After a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, smell disorders frequently occur, significantly affecting patients' quality of life (QoL).

Methods: 110 patients with persistent olfactory disorder after coronavirus infection were enrolled. These patients underwent chemosensory testing using the Sniffin' Sticks test, and completed the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD).

Results: 30% of the patients reported anosmia, and 70% reported hyposmia. Upon comparing subjective and chemosensory testing categories, good category matching was observed in 75.3% (i.e., anosmia based on both methods in 10 and hyposmia in 48 cases). Statistical analysis using the Chi-square test revealed a significant result (p = 0.001 *). Between the TDI (i.e., Threshold, Discrimination, Identification) results of the three subjective report groups (i.e., hyposmia, anosmia, and parosmia), no significant differences were observed. When the TDI and QOD results were compared, no consistent significant correlations were found in most TDI and QOD outcomes. Between the TDI and Scale 2 results, a significant, although slight correlation was observed by the Spearman's (rho = 0.213, p = 0.027 *) and Pearson's (rho = 0.201, p = 0.037 *) tests.

Conclusions: The nonsignificant correlation between objective and subjective methods suggests that these results should be interpreted independently. Moreover, adequate management is essential even in mild cases.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; Sniffin’ Sticks test; olfactory disorders; patient-reported outcome measures; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between the TDI values according to gender. The boxes represent the middle 50% of the data, and the whiskers represent the upper and lower 25%. The black line inside the boxes represents the median value. Differences were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05 *). TDI = Threshold, Discrimination, Identification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation analysis between TDI and duration of symptoms and the participants’ age. Quadratic and linear regressions were used to analyse the relationship in the trends of the parameters (i.e., when age/duration is increasing, the TDI parameter is decreasing, or the contrary). The R2-values show the correlation coefficients, where a perfect correlation has an R2-value of 1. R2 = coefficient of determination; TDI = Threshold, Discrimination, Identification.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between TDI scores and subjective categories reported by the patients. (1): Reference line for anosmia (showing 16). (2): Reference line for normosmia (showing 31). The boxes represent the middle 50% of the data and the whiskers the upper and lower 25%. The black line inside the boxes represents the median value. Differences were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05 *). TDI = Threshold, Discrimination, Identification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gao Y.-D., Ding M., Dong X., Zhang J.-J., Azkur A.K., Azkur D., Gan H., Sun Y.-L., Fu W., Li W., et al. Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A review. Allergy. 2021;76:428–455. doi: 10.1111/all.14657. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chams N., Chams S., Badran R., Shams A., Araji A., Raad M., Mukhopadhyay S., Stroberg E., Duval E.J., Barton L.M., et al. COVID-19: A Multidisciplinary Review. Front. Public Health. 2020;8:383. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lechien J.R., Chiesa-Estomba C.M., De Siati D.R., Horoi M., Le Bon S.D., Rodriguez A., Dequanter D., Blecic S., El Afia F., Distinguin L., et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A multicenter European study. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2020;277:2251–2261. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05965-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beltrán-Corbellini Á., Chico-García J.L., Martínez-Poles J., Rodríguez-Jorge F., Natera-Villalba E., Gómez-Corral J., Gómez-López A., Monreal E., Parra-Díaz P., Cortés-Cuevas J.L., et al. Acute-onset smell and taste disorders in the context of COVID-19: A pilot multicentre polymerase chain reaction based case–control study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27:1738–1741. doi: 10.1111/ene.14273. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Las Casas Lima M.H., Cavalcante A.L.B., Leão S.C. Pathophysiological relationship between COVID-19 and olfactory dysfunction: A systematic review. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;88:794–802. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources