Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986;3(4):207-11.
doi: 10.3109/07420528609079538.

Circadian rhythm of hepatic cytosolic and nuclear estrogen receptors

Affiliations

Circadian rhythm of hepatic cytosolic and nuclear estrogen receptors

P K Eagon et al. Chronobiol Int. 1986.

Abstract

The distribution of estrogen receptor between the cytosolic and nuclear compartments were evaluated in liver of male rats to determine whether a circadian rhythm exists. Cytosolic receptor reached a maximum level at 400 hours and a minimum at 2000 and 2400 hr. Nuclear receptor reached a maximum level at 800 hr and was lowest at 1600 and 2000 hr. Serum estradiol levels were also highest at 800 hr and lowest at 1600 hr. The variations in cytosolic and nuclear receptors are not reciprocal; in fact, the overall content of receptor in the liver is not constant and also displays a circadian rhythm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Variations in cystosolic and nuclear content of estrogen receptor as a function of circadian phase
Panel A, Protamine sulfate precipitates of rat liver cytosol were prepared and incubated with varying concentrations of [3H]E2 in the absence (total binding) and presence (nonspecific binding) of a 100-fold excess of unlabeled DES for 16 hr at 4°C. Specific binqing is calculated as the difference of these two values. Each point is the mean ± S.E.M. of cER in five animals, using duplicate determinations for each animal. Scatchard plots of the specific binding values were used to determine the number of binding sites and affinity of binding. Panel B, Nuclear suspensions were incubated with 10 nM [3H]-E2 in the absebce and presence of a 250-fold excess of unlabeled DES for 1 hr at 30°C, as detailed in Methods. Also shown (open bars) are the serum E2 concentrations as determined by radioimmunoassay.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Variations in total hepatic content of estrogen receptor at different times of day
The height of each bar represents the total receptor content (cytosolic and nuclear) corrected for and expressed as binding per gram of liver. The shaded area of each bar represents the contribution of the nuclear receptor to the total amount.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eagon PK, Porter LE, Francavilla A, DiLeo A, Van Thiel D. Estrogen and androgen receptors in liver: their role in liver disease and regeneration. Semin Liver Dis. 1985;5:59–69. - PubMed
    1. Eagon PK, Fisher SE, Imhoff AF, Porter LE, Stewart RR, Van Thiel DH, Lester R. Estrogen binding proteins of male rat liver: influence of hormonal changes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1980;201:486–499. - PubMed
    1. Eagon PK, Zdunek JR, Van Thiel DH, Singletary BK, Egler KM, Gavaler JS, Porter LE. Alcohol induced changes in hepatic estrogen binding proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1981;211:48–55. - PubMed
    1. Aten RF, Dickson RB, Eisenfe1d AJ. Estrogen receptors in adult male rat liver. Endocrinology. 1978;103:1629–1635. - PubMed
    1. Powell-Jones W, Thompson C, Nayfeh SN, Lucier GW. Sex differences in estrogen binding by cytosolic and nuclear components of rat liver. J Steroid Biochem. 1980;13:219–229. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources