Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 11;14(2):107.
doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05652-z.

CDK5RAP2 is a Wnt target gene and promotes stemness and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

CDK5RAP2 is a Wnt target gene and promotes stemness and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma

Yuehong Shen et al. Cell Death Dis. .

Abstract

In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a highly aggressive and frequently lethal malignancy, the role and action mechanism of the microtubule regulatory protein CDK5RAP2 have not been fully understood. Here, we show that CDK5RAP2 is highly expressed in OSCC and its expression correlates with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis of the disease. The expression of CDK5RAP2 is regulated by the Wnt signaling pathway. Depletion of CDK5RAP2 inhibits the tumorigenesis and migration of OSCC cells and alters the OSCC cancer stem (-like) cell (CSC) signature. Notably, suppression of CDK5RAP2 expression disrupts spindle orientation during mitosis. Collectively, these results identify CDK5RAP2 as a potential CSC marker and reveal a mechanism that controls the CSC population in OSCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. CDK5RAP2 is upregulated in OSCC.
AC CDK5RAP2 expression in OSCC according to sample types A, cancer stages B, and nodal metastasis status C. D Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of TCGA-OSCC cohorts grouped by CDK5RAP2 expression level. E IHC staining of CDK5RAP2 in OSCC. Rectangular area is enlarged. CDK5RAP2 expression was quantified using Image J (n = 50). Scale bars, 20 μm. Data are presented as means ± SEM; ns no significance, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. CDK5RAP2 expression is regulated by the Wnt signaling pathway.
A, B HOK cells were treated with 25 μM ICG-001 A or 100 ng/mL Wnt3a B for 24 h and then cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. CDK5RAP2 protein levels were quantified and normalized to the β-actin protein levels. C ChIP assay was performed using rabbit anti-CBP antibody or normal rabbit IgG. RPE1 cells were treated with DMSO as mock treatment or 25 μM ICG-001. D Schematic of predicted CBP-binding sites in the cdk5rap2 promoter region. Binding between CBP and the cdk5rap2 promoter was determined using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. RPE1 cells transfected with distinct promotor fragments were treated with or without ICG-001. Firefly luciferase intensity was normalized relative to Renilla luciferase intensity. Data are presented as means ± SD; ns no significance, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. CDK5RAP2 downregulation inhibits OSCC tumorigenesis.
A Cal27 cells were infected with a recombinant lentivirus containing CDK5RAP2 shRNA (CDK5RAP2 RNAi) or negative-control shRNA (Control), and then lysates of stable cells were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. B Colony-formation assay was performed using control and stable CDK5RAP2-knockdown cells. Colonies in each well were counted. C shRNA-carrying lines of Cal27 cells were injected subcutaneously into nude mice. The image shows isolated tumors. Mice were weighed every 4 days after injection, and the isolated tumors were weighed. Data are presented as means ± SD; ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. CDK5RAP2 downregulation inhibits OSCC cell migration.
A, B Wound-healing assay was performed using Cal27 A and HSC-3 B stable cells. Representative images are shown. Ratios of wound closure at 48 h or 6 h were quantified. C Transwell migration assay was performed using stable cells. Representative images are shown. The migrated cell number per field was quantified. Data are presented as means ± SD; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test. Scale bars, 200 μm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CDK5RAP2 knockdown suppresses stemness of OSCC cells.
A, B Equal numbers of control and CDK5RAP2-knockdown stable Cal27 cells A or HSC-3 cells B were seeded into ultra-low-attachment plates and incubated for 8 days, after which the spheres (diameter > 50 μm) were counted. Scale bars, 50 μm. C Correlation between CDK5RAP2 and HNSCC CSC markers. D Heatmap presenting gene-expression profiles of control and stable CDK5RAP2-knockdown cells. Gene expression was measured using RNA-sequencing, and GSEA was performed. E Control and stable CDK5RAP2-knockdown cells were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice. The panel shows representative images of tumor sections stained with antibodies against ALDH1, SOX2, CD44, CD133, Notch1, EZH2, and CCND1. Image J was used to analyze the relative expression intensities of indicated CSC markers from isolated xenograft tumors. Scale bar, 100 μm. All data are presented as means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. CDK5RAP2 regulates spindle orientation.
A Schematic depicting calculation of spindle angles. The horizontal distance (X μm) and the vertical distance (Z μm) between two spindle poles of metaphase cells were measured by acquiring Z-stack images. Spindle angle (αο), the angle between the spindle axis and the substrate plane, was calculated using an inverse trigonometric function. B Representative Z-stack images of metaphase cells. HeLa cells were fixed and immunostained with anti-α-tubulin and anti-γ-tubulin antibodies. White arrows indicate the focal planes of two spindle poles in two different sections. Scale bars, 5 μm. The spindle angle of HeLa cells after control or CDK5RAP2 knockdown was quantified. Data are presented as means ± SD; *P < 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tandon P, Dadhich A, Saluja H, Bawane S, Sachdeva S. The prevalence of squamous cell carcinoma in different sites of oral cavity at our Rural Health Care Centre in Loni, Maharashtra - a retrospective 10-year study. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2017;21:178–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sacco AG, Cohen EE. Current treatment options for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3305–13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.0963. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen D, Wang C-Y. Targeting cancer stem cells in squamous cell carcinoma. Precis Clin Med. 2019;2:152–65. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbz016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasahira T, Kirita T. Hallmarks of cancer-related newly prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2413. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082413. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms