Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:2:100151.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100151. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

Application of the COM-B model to patient barriers and facilitators of retention in medication treatment for opioid use disorder in rural Northeastern United States: A qualitative study

Affiliations

Application of the COM-B model to patient barriers and facilitators of retention in medication treatment for opioid use disorder in rural Northeastern United States: A qualitative study

Melissa N Poulsen et al. SSM Ment Health. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce illicit opioid use and overdose mortality, but effectiveness remains limited by poor treatment retention. Understanding multilevel barriers and facilitators to retention from the patient perspective can guide intervention strategies to improve retention.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews to elicit perspectives of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) currently (n = 19) and formerly (n = 16) receiving treatment from a multi-clinic outpatient MOUD program in Pennsylvania in July 2020 to January 2021. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior model provided a theoretical framework for analysis.

Results: Based on interview themes, physical, rather than psychological, capability was more salient to MOUD engagement, and pertained to individual-level factors such as side effects, withdrawal, and the degree to which MOUD addressed participants' need for pain management. Co-existing mental health conditions also challenged participants' physical ability to attend appointments. The opportunity domain contained both physical and social aspects. Physical opportunity for MOUD engagement centered on community-level factors related to MOUD access (e.g., distance, transportation) and clinical-level factors including program policies. Themes related to social opportunity included interpersonal influences-such as therapeutic and social support-and stigma associated with OUD and MOUD. Motivation emerged as the dominant domain for patients. Reflective motivation factors included individual-level factors such as participants' recognition of their addiction and "readiness" to quit illicit opioid use, attitudes toward MOUD, future treatment expectations, motivation to engage in MOUD, and perceived consequences of disengagement. Automatic motivation factors included the degree to which MOUD created a sense of normalcy for participants and the use of illicit drugs to numb emotions.

Conclusions: Factors at the individual, interpersonal, clinical, community, and societal levels influenced patients' capability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in MOUD. Understanding such factors can inform implementation strategies to improve retention.

Keywords: Addiction; Buprenorphine; Opioid-related disorders; Qualitative research; Rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Application of COM-B model components to factors related to patient engagement in MOUD, based on themes from interview findings. The level(s) at which each factor operates is depicted in highlighted abbreviations following the description of each factor: ID, individual; IP, interpersonal; CL, clinical; CM, community; S, societal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbour JS, Jarvis MA, & Withers DJ (2020). How Geisinger dramatically reduced deaths from opioid use disorder. NEJM Catal., 1.
    1. Beatty Kate, Hale Nathan, Meit Michael, Heffernan Megan, Dougherty Michelle, Rocha Luciana, et al. (2019). Issue brief: Health disparities related to opioid misuse in Appalachia - practical strategies and recommendations for communities. https://www.arc.gov/report/health-disparities-opioid-misuse/. (Accessed 26 August 2022).
    1. Beharie N, Kaplan-Dobbs M, Urmanche A, Paone D, & Harocopos A (2022). I didn’t feel like a number”: the impact of nurse care managers on the provision of buprenorphine treatment in primary care settings. J. Subst. Abuse Treat, 132, Article 108633. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentzley BS, Barth KS, Back SE, & Book SW (2015). Discontinuation of buprenorphine maintenance therapy: perspectives and outcomes. J. Subst. Abuse Treat, 52, 48–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brorson HH, Ajo Arnevik E, Rand-Hendriksen K, & Duckert F (2013). Drop-out from addiction treatment: a systematic review of risk factors. Clin. Psychol. Rev, 33, 1010–1024. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources