Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;47(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/s42269-023-00992-4. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Field evaluation of the novel One Step Malaria Pf and Pf/Pv rapid diagnostic tests and the proportion of HRP-2 gene deletion identified on samples collected in the Pwani region, Tanzania

Zena E Mwangonela  1   2 , Young Ye  3 , Qin Rachel  3 , Hajirani M Msuya  1 , Tunu G Mwamlima  1   2 , Sarah S Mswata  1 , Prosper P Chaki  1 , Ester G Kimaro  2 , Clement N Mweya  4 , Maxmillian G Mpina  1 , Grace W Mwangoka  1
Affiliations

Field evaluation of the novel One Step Malaria Pf and Pf/Pv rapid diagnostic tests and the proportion of HRP-2 gene deletion identified on samples collected in the Pwani region, Tanzania

Zena E Mwangonela et al. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2023.

Abstract

Background: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) have played an important role in the early detection of clinical malaria in an endemic area. While several mRDTs are currently on the market, the availability of mRDTs with high sensitivity and specificity will merit the fight against malaria. We evaluated the field performance of a novel One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits in Pwani, Tanzania.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted in Bagamoyo and Kibiti districts in Tanzania, symptomatic patients were tested using the SD BIOLINE, One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits, microscope, and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). An additional qPCR assay was carried out to detect Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (HRP-2) gene deletion on mRDT negative but microscope and qPCR positive samples. Microscope results confirmed by qPCR were used for analysis, where qPCR was used as a reference method.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs were 96.0% (CI 93.5-97.7%) and 98.3% (CI 96.8-99.2%), respectively. One Step P.f mRDT had sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% (CI 92.5-97.1%) and 97.9% (CI 96.3-99.0%) respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.6% (CI 95.4-98.7%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.2% (CI 95.5-98.3%) for the One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs respectively, while One Step P.f mRDT had positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.0% (CI 94.8-98.3%) and 96.7 (CI 94.9-97.9%) respectively. 9.8% (CI 7.84-11.76) of all samples tested and reported to be malaria-negative by mRDT had HRP-2 gene deletion.

Conclusion: One Step Malaria P.f/P.v Tri-line and One Step Malaria P.f rapid test kits have similar sensitivity and specificity as the standard mRDT that is currently in the market, demonstrating the potential to contribute in the fight against malaria in endemic settings. However, the identified malaria parasites population with HRP-2 gene deletion pose a threat to the current mRDT usability in the field and warrants further investigations.

Keywords: HRP-2 gene deletion; Malaria; Rapid diagnostic test; Sensitivity; Specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Histograms representing number of positive and negative results for One Step Malaria Pf/Pv Tri-line mRDT when blood collected from different anticoagulants were used for testing using different operators. b Histograms representing number of positive and negative results for One Step Malaria Pf RDTs when blood collected from different anticoagulants were used for testing using different operators
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agaba BB, Yeka A, Nsobya S, Arinaitwe E, Nankabirwa J, Opigo J, Mbaka P, Lim CS, Kalyango JN, Karamagi C, Kamya MR. Systematic review of the status of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletion, approaches and methods used for its estimation and reporting in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Africa: review of published studies 2010–2019. Malar J. 2019;18(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2987-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belachew M, Wolde M, Nega D, Gidey B, Negash L, Assefa A. Evaluating performance of multiplex real time PCR for the diagnosis of malaria at elimination targeted low transmission settings of Ethiopia. Malar J. 2022 doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-04029-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berzosa P, González V, Taravillo L, Mayor A, Romay-Barja M, Garciá L, Ncogo P, Riloha M, Benito A. First evidence of the deletion in the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in Plasmodium falciparum from Equatorial Guinea. Malar J. 2020;19(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03178-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bylicka-Szczepanowska E, Korzeniewski K. Asymptomatic malaria infections in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: experience from the Central African Republic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063544. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charpentier E, Benichou E, Pagès A, Chauvin P, Fillaux J, Valentin A, Guegan H, Guemas E, Salabert AS, Armengol C, Menard S, Cassaing S, Berry A, Iriart X. Performance evaluation of different strategies based on microscopy techniques, rapid diagnostic test and molecular loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the diagnosis of imported malaria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(1):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.05.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources