(How) should researchers publicize their research papers before peer review?
- PMID: 36777380
- PMCID: PMC9896438
- DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04646-0
(How) should researchers publicize their research papers before peer review?
Abstract
News outlets publicize scientific research findings that have not been peer reviewed yet, and they often do it with active contribution by the authors of the unpublished manuscripts. While researchers are aware of the importance of the peer review process and what it means to discuss findings before manuscripts are accepted for publication, the general public is not. It is imperative to ensure that researchers provide reliable scientific knowledge to each other and to the public, as well as to preserve reliance on the scientific process and peer review. For these reasons, researchers should be more cautious in communicating unpublished work to the public and more accurate about the status of the presented scientific information.
Keywords: Peer review; Preprints; Science communication.
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-43. eCollection 2014 Oct. EJIFCC. 2014. PMID: 27683470 Free PMC article.
-
Publication and Impact of Preprints Included in the First 100 Editions of the CDC COVID-19 Science Update: Content Analysis.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jul 15;8(7):e35276. doi: 10.2196/35276. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022. PMID: 35544426 Free PMC article.
-
Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.N Z Vet J. 2003 Aug;51(4):199. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2003.36367. N Z Vet J. 2003. PMID: 16032326
-
A systematic analysis of preprints in Trauma & Orthopaedic surgery.Bone Jt Open. 2022 Aug;3(8):582-588. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.37.BJO-2022-0060.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2022. PMID: 35848996 Free PMC article. Review.
-
On the role of review papers in the face of escalating publication rates - a case study of research on contaminants of emerging concern (CECs).Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:104960. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104960. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Environ Int. 2019. PMID: 31299604 Review.
Cited by
-
Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news.Public Underst Sci. 2025 Feb;34(2):154-171. doi: 10.1177/09636625241268881. Epub 2024 Oct 11. Public Underst Sci. 2025. PMID: 39392727 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beachum, L., Bever, L., & Iati, M. (2021, August 10). They worry the Johnson & Johnson shot isn’t enough. A new study offers answers—and questions. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/08/10/johnson-johnson-covid-v...
-
- Bergstrom CT, West JD. Calling bullshit: The art of skepticism in a data-driven world. Random House; 2021.
-
- Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge.
-
- de Vries RD, Schmitz KS, Bovier FT, Noack D, Haagmans BL, Biswas S, Rockx B, Gellman SH, Alabi CA, de Swart RL, Moscona A, Porotto M. Intranasal fusion inhibitory lipopeptide prevents direct contact SARS-CoV-2 transmission in ferrets. Science. 2021;371:1379–1382. doi: 10.1126/science.abf4896. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources