Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 8;15(2):e34787.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.34787. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Efficacy, Safety, and Reliability of the Single Anterior Approach for Subaxial Cervical Spine Dislocation

Affiliations

Efficacy, Safety, and Reliability of the Single Anterior Approach for Subaxial Cervical Spine Dislocation

Sharif Jonayed et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Though there is ongoing controversy regarding the best treatment option for cervical spine dislocation (CSD), anterior cervical surgery with direct decompression is becoming widely accepted. However, managing all cases of subaxial CSD entirely by a single anterior approach is rarely seen in the published literature. Methods The study comprised patients with subaxial CSD who underwent surgical stabilization utilizing a single anterior approach. Most of the CSD was reduced and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were performed. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) were done in unreduced dislocations. The patient's neurological condition, radiological findings, and functional outcomes were assessed. SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis. Results The total number of operated cases was 64, with an average of 42 months of follow-up. The mean age was 34.50±11.92 years. The most prevalent level of injury was C5/C6 (57.7%). Reduction was achieved in 92.2% of cases; only 7.8% of patients needed corpectomy. The typical operative time was 84.25±9.55 minutes, with an average blood loss of 112.12±25.27 ml. All cases except complete spinal cord injury (CSI) were improved neurologically (87.63%). The mean Neck Disability Index (NDI) was 11.14±11.43, and the pre-operative mean visual analog score (VAS) was finally improved to 2.05±0.98 (P<0.05). In all cases, fusion was achieved. The most common complication was transient dysphagia (23.4%). After surgery, no patient developed or aggravated a neurological impairment. Implant failure was not observed at the final follow-up except for two cases where screws were pulled out partially. Conclusion Based on the results of this study, a single anterior approach is a safe and effective procedure for subaxial CSD treatment with favorable radiological, neurological, and functional outcomes.

Keywords: anterior cervical corpectomyand fusion (accf); anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (acdf); single anterior approach; subaxial cervical spine dislocation (csd); traumatic cervical spine injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)
A. Preoperative T2-weighted sagittal section of the cervical spine B. Preoperative X-ray of the cervical spine in lateral view C: Postoperative X-ray of the cervical spine in the antero-posterior and (D) lateral view E: X-ray of the cervical spine in lateral view at final follow-up (fusion)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF)
A: T1-weighted sagittal MR image of the cervical spine showing fracture-dislocation at C3/4 B: X-ray cervical spine in lateral view showing fracture-dislocation at C3/4 C: X-ray cervical spine in antero-posterior and (D) lateral view showing solid fusion mass at final follow-up
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of our preferred protocol
ACDF: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ACCF: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion
Figure 4
Figure 4. Neurological grade improvement
ASIA: American Spinal Injury Association

References

    1. Comparison of three prehospital cervical spine protocols for missed injuries. Hong R, Meenan M, Prince E, Murphy R, Tambussi C, Rohrbach R, Baumann BM. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:471–479. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mortality in elderly patients after cervical spine fractures. Harris MB, Reichmann WM, Bono CM, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:567–574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Comparative study of surgical approaches for distractive flexion injuries of the sub-axial cervical spine. Al Samouly HM, Taha AM. Open J Mod Neurosurg. 2018;8:342–351.
    1. Treatment of traumatic dislocations of the cervical spine through anterior approach. Defino HL, Figueira FG, Camargo LS, Canto FR. https://www.scielo.br/j/aob/a/LSrMTwBG69CWPQZC9p4rwZR/?format=pdf&lang=en Acta Ortop Bras. 2007;15:30–34.
    1. Controversies in the treatment of cervical spine dislocations. Lee JY, Nassr A, Eck JC, Vaccaro AR. Spine J. 2009;9:418–423. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources