Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;10(3):392-399.
doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

Deception and Lie Detection in the Courtroom: The Effect of Defendants Wearing Medical Face Masks

Aldert Vrij  1 , Maria Hartwig  2
Affiliations

Deception and Lie Detection in the Courtroom: The Effect of Defendants Wearing Medical Face Masks

Aldert Vrij et al. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, defendants and witnesses (as well as the prosecution and defense counsel) may wear medical face masks to prevent the spread of the virus. Alternatively, courtrooms proceedings may take place virtually. In this article, we discuss how these deviations from normal procedures may affect jurors' lie detection ability and decision-making. Although research addressing this specific question does not exist, we are able to formulate an informed view based on the extensive deception literature. Since nonverbal signs of deception in the face and body are virtually absent, we conclude that medical face mask-wearing or virtual courtroom proceedings will not hamper jurors' lie detection abilities. If jurors can hear the speech well, they may become better at detecting deception if they pay more attention to speech content, which may occur as a result of mask-wearing in the courtroom.

Keywords: COVID-19; Deception; Jury decision making; Lie detection; Nonverbal behaviour; Signal Detection Theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blair J.P., Levine T., Shaw A. Content in context improves deception detection accuracy. Human Communication Research. 2010;36:423–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01382.x. - DOI
    1. Bond C.F., DePaulo B.M. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2006;10:214–234. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buller D.B., Strzyzewski K.D., Hunsaker F.G. Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs. 1991;58:25–40. doi: 10.1080/03637759109376212. - DOI
    1. Burgoon J.K., Guerrero L.K., Floyd K. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. Nonverbal communication.
    1. Cohen P. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;122:155–159. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. - DOI - PubMed