Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 9;32(3):353-360.
doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01201-0. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Effect of set-type yoghurt supplemented with the novel probiotic Lantiplantibacillus plantarum 200655 on physicochemical properties and the modulation of oxidative stress-induced damage

Affiliations

Effect of set-type yoghurt supplemented with the novel probiotic Lantiplantibacillus plantarum 200655 on physicochemical properties and the modulation of oxidative stress-induced damage

Kariyawasam Majuwana Gamage Menaka Menike Kariyawasam et al. Food Sci Biotechnol. .

Abstract

The present study developed a functional yoghurt supplemented with Lantiplantibacillus plantarum 200655 and evaluated its physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities. Yoghurt samples were prepared using commercial starter cultures and probiotics and grouped as follows: control sample without probiotics (C), GG (supplemented with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG), R (supplemented with L. plantarum KCTC 3108), and S (supplemented with L. plantarum 200655). The GG, R, and S samples had shorter fermentation time compared with the C sample. Lactic acid bacteria count, pH, and titratable acidity were similar in all samples during refrigerated storage. However, the GG, R, and S samples showed increased viscosity and water holding capacity (WHC), and decreased syneresis. The S sample had no adverse effect on organoleptic properties. Furthermore, the S sample had the highest antioxidant activity and significantly inhibited LPS-induced oxidative stress in intestinal cells. These findings suggest the potential use of L. plantarum 200655 in dairy products with therapeutic benefits.

Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Functional food; Probiotics; ROS activity; Yoghurt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors affirm that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes in (A) pH during fermentation and (B) titratable acidity and pH during storage at 4 °C for 21 days. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. C, control yoghurt fermented with starter culture; GG, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. rhamnosus GG; R, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum KCTC 3108; S, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum 200655
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) DPPH and (B) ABTS radical scavenging activity of WSE of yoghurt samples at 7 days of refrigerated storage (4 °C). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Means from different yoghurt samples denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c) are significantly different (p < 0.05). C, control yoghurt fermented with starter culture; GG, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. rhamnosus GG; R, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum KCTC 3108; S, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum 200655
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Fluorescence images of HT-29 cells in the presence of (A) negative control without LPS, (B) 0.1 µg/mL LPS, (C) 0.1 µg/mL LPS and 100 µL of the C sample, (D) 0.1 µg/mL LPS and 100 µL of the GG sample, (E) 0.1 µg/mL LPS and 100 µL of the R sample, (F) 0.1 µg/mL LPS and 100 µL of the S sample, and (G) ROS level (fold change). Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Means from different yoghurt samples denoted by lowercase letters (a-e) are significantly different (p < 0.05). C, control yoghurt fermented with starter culture; GG, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. rhamnosus GG; R, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum KCTC 3108; S, yoghurt fermented with starter culture and L. plantarum 200655

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akan E. The effect of fermentation time and yogurt bacteria on the physicochemical, microbiological and antioxidant properties of probiotic goat yogurts. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias. 2022;94:1–16. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202220210875. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buldo P, Benfeldt C, Folkenberg DM, Jensen HB, Amigo JM, Sieuwerts S, Thygesen K, van den Berg F, Ipsen R. The role of exopolysaccharide-producing cultures and whey protein ingredients in yoghurt. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2016;72:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.04.050. - DOI
    1. Choi J, Sabikhi L, Hassan A, Anand S. Bioactive peptides in dairy products. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2012;65:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2011.00725.x. - DOI
    1. Daniel G, Gabriel F, Branco, Filomena N, Adriano GC, Jose AFF. Functional foods and non-dairy probiotic food development: Trends, concepts, and products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2010;9:292–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00110.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donkor ON, Nilmini SLI, Stolic P, Vasiljevic T, Shah NP. Survival and activity of selected probiotic organisms in set-type yoghurt during cold storage. International Dairy Journal. 2007;17:657–665. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.08.006. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources