Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 2:2023:1303748.
doi: 10.1155/2023/1303748. eCollection 2023.

The Effects of circ_000558/miR-1225-5p/ARL4C on Regulating the Proliferation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells

Affiliations

The Effects of circ_000558/miR-1225-5p/ARL4C on Regulating the Proliferation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells

Ling Xia et al. J Oncol. .

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the top ten tumors over the world. RCC is not sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to find new targets for the treatment. CircRNAs are a special type of noncoding RNAs, which play important roles in many types of cancer. In this study, we found circ_000558 was upregulated in RCC cells, and it elevated the proliferation ability of RCC cells. The relationship between miR-1225-5p and circ_000558 or ARL4C was predicted via circBank and circular RNA interactome and confirmed by dual-luciferase reporter assay. Then, the effects of circ_000558/miR-1225-5p/ARL4C on RCC cell proliferation and apoptosis were assessed by CCK-8 assay. The results revealed that the knockdown of ARL4C significantly reduced RCC cell proliferation and overexpression of circ_000558 could significantly induce RCC cell proliferation after miR-1225-5p treatment further promoted the inhibitory ability of ARL4C knockdown. Overall, our study suggested that circ_000558/miR-1225-5p/ARL4C network was related to the RCC cell proliferation. This finding could provide new targets for the treatment and prognosis of RCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The expression of circ_000558 in RCC cells. (a) Hot map showed the differential expressed circRNAs between RCC tissues and matched nontumor tissues in GSE100186. (b) The expression of circ_000558 in RCC cells (ACHN, 786-O, 769-P, and Caki-1) and human renal epithelial cells (HK2) was tested by qPCR. p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 compared to HK2 cells. (c, d) The expression location of circ_000558 in 769-P (c) and ACHN cells (d) was tested by qPCR analysis. (e, f) The expression of circ_000558 in 769-P cells (e) and ACHN cells (f) after RNase R digested was tested by qPCR assay. ∗∗p < 0.01; ns, no significant difference.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effects of circ_000558 on cell proliferation and apoptosis in RCC cells. (a) The expression of circ_000558 in 769-P and ACHN cells after transfected with si-NC and si-circ_000558 (si-circ) was tested by qPCR analysis. (b) The inhibitor rate of cell proliferation in 769-P and ACHN cells after si-NC and si-circ transfection was measured using CCK-8 assay. (c) The cell apoptosis in 769-P and ACHN cells after si-NC and si-circ transfection was detected by flow cytometry. (d) The protein expression of apoptosis related protein (Bcl-2, Bax, and cleaved caspase-3) was analyzed by western blot assay (p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
circ_000558 regulated RCC cell proliferation by inhibiting miR-1225-5p. (a) Venn diagram showed the overlapped potential target miRNAs in GSE23085, GSE16441, circBank, and circular RNA interactome. The binding site between miR-1225-5p and circ_000558 was shown. (b) The expression of miR-1225-5p in renal carcinoma cells (ACHN, 769-P, and Caki-1) and human renal epithelial cells (HK2) was tested by qPCR analysis. (c) The expression of miR-1225-5p in 769-P and ACHN cells after control and circ_000558 overexpression plasmid transfection was measured by qPCR. (d) The relative luciferase intensity in 769-P and ACHN cells after wild-type of circ_000558 (circ-WT) or mutation type of circ_000558 (circ-Mut) and miR-1225-5p mimics (miR-mimics) cotransfect was tested by dual-luciferase reporter assay. (e) The cell viability of 769-P and ACHN cells after miR-mimics, miR-inhibitor, or miR-mimics + ov-circ transfection was tested by CCK-8 assay. (f) The cell apoptosis of 769-P and ACHN cells after miR-mimics, miR-inhibitor, or miR-mimics + ov-circ transfection was tested by flow cytometry. (∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effect of circ_000558/miR-1225-5p on RCC tumor growth in vivo. (a) The tumor tissues of control, si-circ, and si-circ + miR-mimics groups. (b) Tumor volume was measured every two days (n = 6). (c) Tumor weight was measured (∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Figure 5
Figure 5
ARL4C was a potential target gene of miR-1225-5p. (a) Venn diagram showing the overlapped potential target genes in TargetScan7.2, Targetprofiler, GSE16441, and GSE100666. The binding site between miR-1225-5p, ARL4C, and SEL1L3. (b, c) The expression profile of ARL4C (b) and SEL1L3 (c) in RCC samples by TCGA analysis. Blue, normal samples; red, tumor samples. (d, e) Effect of ARL4C (d) and SEL1L3 (e) expression levels on renal carcinoma patients' survival; red, higher expression; blue, lower expression. (f) The relative luciferase intensity in 769-P and ACHN cells after wild-type of ARL4C (ARL4C-WT) or mutation type of ARL4C (ARL4C-Mut) and miR-1225-5p mimics (miR-mimics) cotransfect was tested by dual-luciferase reporter assay (∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Figure 6
Figure 6
circ_000558/miR-1225-5p/ARL4C regulated RCC cell proliferation. (a) The protein expression of ARL4C in RCC cells (ACHN, 769-P, and Caki-1) and human renal epithelial cells (HK2) was tested by qPCR. (b) qPCR analysis was applied to assess the expression of ARL4C. (c) Cell inhibitor ratio of 769-P and ACHN cells after si-ARL4C, si-ARL4C + ov-circ, si-ARL4C + miR-mimics, or si-ARL4C + miR-mimics + ov-circ transfection was tested by CCK-8 assay. (d) The cell apoptosis of 769-P and ACHN cells after si-ARL4C, si-ARL4C + ov-circ, si-ARL4C + miR-mimics, or si-ARL4C + miR-mimics + ov-circ transfection was tested by flow cytometry. (∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barata P. C., Rini B. I. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2017;67(6):507–524. doi: 10.3322/caac.21411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linehan W. M., Ricketts C. J. The Cancer Genome Atlas of renal cell carcinoma: findings and clinical implications. Nature Reviews Urology . 2019;16(9):539–552. doi: 10.1038/s41585-019-0211-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garje R., Elhag D., Yasin H. A., Acharya L., Vaena D., Dahmoush L. Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Critical Reviews in Oncology . 2021;160 doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103287.103287 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart S. B., Thompson R. H., Psutka S. P., et al. Evaluation of the national comprehensive cancer network and American urological association renal cell carcinoma surveillance guidelines. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2014;32(36):4059–4065. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.5416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhai T., Zhang B., Qu Z., Chen C. Elevated visceral obesity quantified by CT is associated with adverse postoperative outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal clear cell carcinoma patients. International Urology and Nephrology . 2018;50(5):845–850. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1858-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources