Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 26:14:1050899.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1050899. eCollection 2023.

Identifying vulnerable plaques: A 3D carotid plaque radiomics model based on HRMRI

Affiliations

Identifying vulnerable plaques: A 3D carotid plaque radiomics model based on HRMRI

Xun Zhang et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Identification of vulnerable carotid plaque is important for the treatment and prevention of stroke. In previous studies, plaque vulnerability was assessed qualitatively. We aimed to develop a 3D carotid plaque radiomics model based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) to quantitatively identify vulnerable plaques.

Methods: Ninety patients with carotid atherosclerosis who underwent HRMRI were randomized into training and test cohorts. Using the radiological characteristics of carotid plaques, a traditional model was constructed. A 3D carotid plaque radiomics model was constructed using the radiomics features of 3D T1-SPACE and its contrast-enhanced sequences. A combined model was constructed using radiological and radiomics characteristics. Nomogram was generated based on the combined models, and ROC curves were utilized to assess the performance of each model.

Results: 48 patients (53.33%) were symptomatic and 42 (46.67%) were asymptomatic. The traditional model was constructed using intraplaque hemorrhage, plaque enhancement, wall remodeling pattern, and lumen stenosis, and it provided an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.816 vs. 0.778 in the training and testing sets. In the two cohorts, the 3D carotid plaque radiomics model and the combined model had an AUC of 0.915 vs. 0.835 and 0.957 vs. 0.864, respectively. In the training set, both the radiomics model and the combination model outperformed the traditional model, but there was no significant difference between the radiomics model and the combined model.

Conclusions: HRMRI-based 3D carotid radiomics models can improve the precision of detecting vulnerable carotid plaques, consequently improving risk classification and clinical decision-making in patients with carotid stenosis.

Keywords: 3D reconstruction; carotid atherosclerosis (AS); high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging; radiomics; stroke; vulnerable plaque.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart of radiomics model development. (A) 3D carotid plaque segmentation in 3D T1-SPACE and 3D T1-SPACE- CE sequences, respectively; (B) PyRadiomics-based radiomics feature extraction, 13radiomics features were screened at the minimum mean square error of the LASSO regression and used to build radiomics models (a, b); (C) The formulation of radiomics signature (a); The calibration curves (b, c) and decision curves analysis (d, e) for the training and testing cohorts were employed to evaluate the traditional model, the radiomics model and the combined model, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of all the models (traditional model, radiomics model and combined model) in the training and test cohorts respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A nomogram integrating the radiomics scores and traditional features of the training sets.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chaturvedi S, Bruno A, Feasby T, Holloway R, Benavente O, Cohen SN, et al. . Carotid endarterectomy–an evidence-based review: report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. (2005) 65:794–801. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176036.07558.82 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flaherty ML, Kissela B, Khoury JC, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Woo D, et al. . Carotid artery stenosis as a cause of stroke. Neuroepidemiology. (2013) 40:36–41. 10.1159/000341410 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song P, Fang Z, Wang H, Cai Y, Rahimi K, Zhu Y, et al. . Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. (2020) 8:e721–9. 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30117-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. AbuRahma AF, Avgerinos ED, Chang RW, Darling RC, Duncan AA, Forbes TL, et al. . Society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg. (2022) 75:4S−22S. 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.073 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meschia JF, Klaas JP, Brown RD, Brott TG. Evaluation and management of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. (2017) 92:1144–57. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed