Defining quality assessment in vascular surgery training: an expert Delphi process

Abstract

Introduction: A robust and reproducible way of assessing training should optimise and standardise vascular surgical training. This study describes the methodology supporting the Vascular Surgery Specialty Advisory Committee regional quality assurance reports for vascular surgery training programmes in the UK.

Methods: A Delphi consensus exercise was performed to establish the domains of training that most appropriately assess the quality of a vascular surgery training programme. A total of 54 stakeholders were invited to participate, including trainees, training programme directors and members of the vascular speciality advisory committee (SAC), vascular society executive and education committees.

Results: A total of 39 stakeholders successfully completed the three-stage Delphi process over 15 weeks. The domains identified as most appropriate to assess the quality of a vascular training programme were: Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) survey results, clinical experience, regional education programmes, radiology support, timetable, regional support for trainees, trainer support for trainees, opportunities for professional development, trainee-rated quality of consultant teaching and training, and trainee recommendation of the post.

Conclusions: This study describes a method to identify and prioritise domains that are appropriate to assess the quality of a vascular training programme. The domains that were identified as appropriate to assess quality are transferable internationally and the Delphi methodology could be used by other training schemes to 'fine-tune' their own domains to review and optimise the quality of their own training programmes.

Keywords: Delphi; Medical education; Surgical training; Vascular surgery.

Figure 1

Participants in the three-stage Delphi process