Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 1;108(7):1900-1908.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281958.

Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Affiliations

Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy et al. Haematologica. .

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is not well known. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and analyzed the outcomes separately in the RIC and MAC cohorts based on the conditioning regimens used. Among 872 eligible patients, 493 underwent allo-HCT using RIC (fludarabine/ busulfan n=166, fludarabine/melphalan n=327) and 379 using MAC (fludarabine/busulfan n=247, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=132). In multivariable analysis with RIC, fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.80; 95% confidenec interval [CI]: 1.15-2.81; P=0.009), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.12-2.91; P=0.01) and higher acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (grade 2-4 HR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.03-2.03; P=0.03; grade 3-4 HR=2.21; 95%CI: 1.28-3.83; P=0.004) compared to fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GvHD (grade 2-4 HR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.67-3.25; P<0.001; grade 3-4 HR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.52-3.52; P<0.001) and inferior GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR=1.94; 95% CI: 1.49-2.53; P<0.001) as compared to fludarabine/busulfan. Hence, our study suggests that fludarabine/busulfan is associated with better outcomes in RIC (better overall survival, lower early non-relapse mortality, lower acute GvHD) and MAC (lower acute GvHD and better GRFS) in myelofibrosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overall survival with reduced-intensity conditioning. RIC: reduced-intensity conditioning; Flu: fludarabine; Bu: busulfan; Mel: melphalan.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival with myeloablative conditioning. MAC: myeloablative conditioning; Flu: fludarabine; Bu: busul-fan; Mel: melphalan.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Graf-versus-host-disease-free relapse-free survival with myeloablative conditioning. MAC: myeloablative conditioning; CY: cyclophosphamide; GvHD: graft-versus-host disease; Flu: fludarabine; Bu: busulfan; Mel: melphalan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(1):145-162. - PubMed
    1. Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms: a contemporary eview. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):97-105. - PubMed
    1. Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, et al. . JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):787-798. - PubMed
    1. Phelan R, Arora M, Chen M. Current use and outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: CIBMTR US summary slides, 2020.
    1. Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Kröger N, et al. . Determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2021;35(1):215-224. - PubMed

Publication types