Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis
- PMID: 36779595
- PMCID: PMC10316233
- DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281958
Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is not well known. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and analyzed the outcomes separately in the RIC and MAC cohorts based on the conditioning regimens used. Among 872 eligible patients, 493 underwent allo-HCT using RIC (fludarabine/ busulfan n=166, fludarabine/melphalan n=327) and 379 using MAC (fludarabine/busulfan n=247, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=132). In multivariable analysis with RIC, fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.80; 95% confidenec interval [CI]: 1.15-2.81; P=0.009), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.12-2.91; P=0.01) and higher acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (grade 2-4 HR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.03-2.03; P=0.03; grade 3-4 HR=2.21; 95%CI: 1.28-3.83; P=0.004) compared to fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GvHD (grade 2-4 HR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.67-3.25; P<0.001; grade 3-4 HR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.52-3.52; P<0.001) and inferior GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR=1.94; 95% CI: 1.49-2.53; P<0.001) as compared to fludarabine/busulfan. Hence, our study suggests that fludarabine/busulfan is associated with better outcomes in RIC (better overall survival, lower early non-relapse mortality, lower acute GvHD) and MAC (lower acute GvHD and better GRFS) in myelofibrosis.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Reduced-Intensity Compared to Nonmyeloablative Conditioning in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Jan;30(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Oct 1. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024. PMID: 37788792 Free PMC article.
-
Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Oct;22(10):1808-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27470290
-
Association of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens With Overall Survival Among Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Transplant.JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1011-1018. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1278. JAMA Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32496525 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Myeloablative with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens and Bone Marrow with Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts.Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Sep;27(9):782.e1-782.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 16. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021. PMID: 34146733
-
Choosing a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine Melphalan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 22. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019. PMID: 30471339
Cited by
-
Donor types and outcomes of transplantation in myelofibrosis: a CIBMTR study.Blood Adv. 2024 Aug 27;8(16):4281-4293. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013451. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 38916866 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in children and adolescents: the retrospective study of the EBMT Paediatric Diseases WP.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Aug;59(8):1057-1069. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02286-3. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38627449 Free PMC article.
-
Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin improves GvHD-free and relapse-free survival in myelofibrosis after matched related or unrelated donor transplantation.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Aug;59(8):1154-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02291-6. Epub 2024 May 21. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38773281 Free PMC article.
-
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Myelofibrosis and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Contemporary Review.Am J Hematol. 2025 Jun;100 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):16-29. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27660. Epub 2025 Mar 13. Am J Hematol. 2025. PMID: 40079242 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: eligibility, best practices, and improving transplant outcomes.Ann Hematol. 2025 Apr;104(4):2125-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06270-9. Epub 2025 Mar 22. Ann Hematol. 2025. PMID: 40119918 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(1):145-162. - PubMed
-
- Tefferi A, Pardanani A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms: a contemporary eview. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):97-105. - PubMed
-
- Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, et al. . JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):787-798. - PubMed
-
- Phelan R, Arora M, Chen M. Current use and outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: CIBMTR US summary slides, 2020.
-
- Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Kröger N, et al. . Determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2021;35(1):215-224. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources