Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jul-Aug;94(4):970-984.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13914. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

Language and reading impairments are associated with increased prevalence of non-right-handedness

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Language and reading impairments are associated with increased prevalence of non-right-handedness

Filippo Abbondanza et al. Child Dev. 2023 Jul-Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Handedness has been studied for association with language-related disorders because of its link with language hemispheric dominance. No clear pattern has emerged, possibly because of small samples, publication bias, and heterogeneous criteria across studies. Non-right-handedness (NRH) frequency was assessed in N = 2503 cases with reading and/or language impairment and N = 4316 sex-matched controls identified from 10 distinct cohorts (age range 6-19 years old; European ethnicity) using a priori set criteria. A meta-analysis (Ncases = 1994) showed elevated NRH % in individuals with language/reading impairment compared with controls (OR = 1.21, CI = 1.06-1.39, p = .01). The association between reading/language impairments and NRH could result from shared pathways underlying brain lateralization, handedness, and cognitive functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Meta‐analysis of non‐right‐handedness (NRH) frequency in individuals with language/reading impairments. The forest plot shows the results of the meta‐analysis run under a random effect (RE) model. The OR estimates are shown with the 95% confidence interval and the weights (in percentages) on the overall result of OR = 1.21, CI = 1.06–1.39 (t = 3.16, p = .01). See Figure S1 for the corresponding funnel plot. ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; RH, right‐handedness; TEDS, Twins Early Development Study; UKDYS, UK Dyslexia.

References

    1. Annett, M. , & Kilshaw, D. (1984). Lateral preference and skill in dyslexics: Implications of the right shift theory. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry., 25, 357–377. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1984.tb00158.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Annett, M. , & Turner, A. (1974). Laterality and the growth of intellectual abilities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 37–46. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1974.tb00764.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armour, J. A. , Davison, A. , & McManus, I. C. (2014). Genome‐wide association study of handedness excludes simple genetic models. Heredity, 112, 221–225. 10.1038/hdy.2013.93hdy201393[pii] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnett, A. B. , Pennington, B. F. , Peterson, R. L. , Willcutt, E. G. , DeFries, J. C. , & Olson, R. K. (2017). Explaining the sex difference in dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 58, 719–727. 10.1111/jcpp.12691 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balduzzi, S. , Rücker, G. , & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta‐analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence‐Based Mental Health, 22, 153–160. 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types