Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0280685.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280685. eCollection 2023.

Validation of saline, PBS and a locally produced VTM at varying storage conditions to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus by qRT-PCR

Affiliations

Validation of saline, PBS and a locally produced VTM at varying storage conditions to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus by qRT-PCR

Caroline Ngetsa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Coronavirus Disease-2019 tests require a Nasopharyngeal (NP) and/or Oropharyngeal (OP) specimen from the upper airway, from which virus RNA is extracted and detected through quantitative reverse transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). The viability of the virus is maintained after collection by storing the NP/OP swabs in Viral Transport Media (VTM). We evaluated the performance of four transport media: locally manufactured ("REVITAL") Viral Transport Media (RVTM), Standard Universal Transport Media (SUTM), PBS and 0.9% (w/v) NaCl (normal saline). We used laboratory cultured virus to evaluate: i) viral recovery and maintaining integrity at different time periods and temperatures; ii) stability in yielding detectable RNA consistently for all time points and conditions; and iii) their overall accuracy. Four vials of SARS-CoV-2 cultured virus (2 high and 2 low concentration samples) and 1 negative control sample were prepared for each media type (SUTM, RVTM, PBS and normal saline) and stored at the following temperatures, -80°C, 4°C, 25°C and 37°C for 7 days. Viral RNA extractions and qRT-PCR were performed at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days after inoculation with the cultured virus to assess virus stability and viral recovery. Ct values fell over time at 25°C and 37°C, but normal saline, PBS, RVTM and SUTM all showed comparable performance in maintaining virus integrity and stability allowing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Overall, this study demonstrated that normal saline, PBS and the locally manufactured VTM can be used for COVID-19 sample collection and testing, thus expanding the range of SARS-CoV-2 viral collection media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. An illustration showing virus dilutions in different media types and different virus inoculation temperatures.
Each media type was made up of 2 tubes inoculated with high virus concentrations, 2 tubes of low virus concentrations and 1 negative control (no viral inoculum) tube, generating a total of 5 tubes stored at the following temperatures: -80°C, 4°C, 25°C (room temperature) and 37°C and subsequently used to extract RNA for qRT-PCR on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. Thus, each media type consisted of a total of 80 tubes, that were subsequently extracted for RNA to conduct the qRT-PCR.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Mean Ct values for the four media types over time (in days) at -80ºC, 4ºC, room temperature (25ºC) and 37ºC stratified by concentration.
A Ct>36 or 37 indicates a negative result. The gaps in temperatures -80°C and 4°C indicate the negative samples, these were samples with Ct<36, which were excluded from the analyses. Each data point is the mean of 4 samples, the 2 high and 2 low concentration samples assayed in duplicate and the negative control sample data points are the mean of the duplicates.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Correlations between Ct values from the 4 media types.
(A) Scatter plots for Ct values at low concentration. (B) Scatter plots for Ct values at high concentration. The line of best fit was estimated using a Deming regression model.

References

    1. Shen M, Xiao Y, Zhuang G, Li Y, Zhang L. Mass testing—An underexplored strategy for COVID-19 control. The Innovation. 2021. May 28;2(2):100114. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kevadiya BD, Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Oleynikov MD, Blomberg WR, Bajwa N, et al.. Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nature Materials. 2021;20(5):593–605. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrera-Avalos C, Luraschi R, Vallejos-Vidal E, Figueroa M, Arenillas E, Barría D, et al.. Analysis by real-time PCR of five transport and conservation mediums of nasopharyngeal swab samples to COVID-19 diagnosis in Santiago of Chile. J Med Virol. 2022. Mar 1;94(3):1167–74. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27446 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Druce J, Garcia K, Tran T, Papadakis G, Birch C. Evaluation of swabs, transport media, and specimen transport conditions for optimal detection of viruses by PCR. J Clin Microbiology. 2012. Mar;50(3):1064–5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06551-11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preparation of viral transport medium [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 May 10]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/Viral-Transport-Medi...

Publication types