Lessons Learned From the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model at an Academic Tertiary Center: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
- PMID: 36781061
- PMCID: PMC10839807
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.014
Lessons Learned From the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model at an Academic Tertiary Center: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Abstract
Background: Our institution participated in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model from 2016 to 2020. Here we review lessons learned from a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care redesign at a tertiary academic center amid changing: (1) CJR rules; (2) inpatient only rules; and (3) outpatient trends.
Methods: Quality, financial, and patient demographic data from the years prior to and during participation in CJR were obtained from institutional and Medicare reconciled CJR performance data.
Results: Despite an increase in true outpatients and new challenges that arose from changing inpatient-only rules, there was significant improvement in quality metrics: decreased length of stay (3.48-1.52 days, P < .001), increased home discharge rate (70.2-85.5%, P < .001), decreased readmission rate (17.7%-5.1%, P < .001), decreased complication rate (6.5%-2.0%, P < .001), and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Composite Quality Score increased from 4.4 to 17.6. Over the five year period, CMS saved an estimated $8.3 million on 1,486 CJR cases, $7.5 million on 1,351 non-CJR cases, and $600,000 from the voluntary classification of 371 short-stay inpatients as outpatient-a total savings of $16.4 million. Despite major physician time and effort leading to marked improvements in efficiency, quality, and large cost savings for CMS, CJR participation resulted in a net penalty of $304,456 to our institution, leading to zero physician gainsharing opportunities.
Conclusion: The benefits of CJR were tempered by malalignment of incentives among payer, hospital, and physician as well as a lack of transparency. Future payment models should be refined based on the successes and challenges of CJR.
Keywords: arthroplasty; bundled payments; comprehensive care for joint replacement; health policy; value-based care.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
No Changes in Patient Selection and Value-Based Metrics for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundle Implementation at a Single Center.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1581-1584. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 15. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 31171397
-
Evaluation of Economic and Clinical Outcomes Under Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mandatory Bundled Payments for Joint Replacements.JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):924-931. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0480. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31157819 Free PMC article.
-
Patient selection in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model.Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):72-90. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13880. Epub 2021 Oct 6. Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 34612519 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2590-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 20. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28438453 Review.
-
Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: Keeping Our Care Affordable and High in Quality.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Sep;10(3):370-377. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9423-6. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017. PMID: 28741101 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing Quality Care within a Bundled Framework.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 May 1;36(5):976-980. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000665. Epub 2025 Feb 14. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39951349 No abstract available.
-
Total knee arthroplasty reimbursement is declining overall and at a marginally faster rate amongst female orthopaedic surgeons: A Medicare analysis.J Orthop. 2024 Oct 19;63:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.029. eCollection 2025 May. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39524106
-
Preoperatively predicting failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference and the substantial clinical benefit in patient-reported outcome measures for total hip arthroplasty patients using machine learning.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 14;26(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08339-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 39953514 Free PMC article.
-
Reversal of the Halo Effect: Prolonged Participation in Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Negatively Impacts Revision Metrics.Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 20;28:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101466. eCollection 2024 Aug. Arthroplast Today. 2024. PMID: 39100415 Free PMC article.
-
Declining Service Labor Rates for Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients.Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 12;33:101742. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101742. eCollection 2025 Jun. Arthroplast Today. 2025. PMID: 40585395 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials