Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;20(6):2260-2268.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.14107. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

The impact of a new intervention for venous leg ulcers: A within-patient controlled trial

Richard Hillson Bull  1 , Donna Clements  2 , Agnes Juguilon Collarte  3 , Keith Gordon Harding  4
Affiliations

The impact of a new intervention for venous leg ulcers: A within-patient controlled trial

Richard Hillson Bull et al. Int Wound J. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

A major obstacle to the development of new treatments for venous leg ulcers is the difficulty in generating evidence for their effectiveness. Randomised controlled trials using complete healing as the endpoint are seldom powered to be successful, owing to the heterogeneity of cohorts. A novel approach to the evaluation of treatments is presented, using a self-controlled trial model and two metrics of short-term healing rate as alternate endpoints: rate of wound margin advance, and percentage area reduction over 4 weeks. Two different treatment regimens are compared: multi-layer compression alone, versus multi-layer compression combined with activation of the venous leg pump by neuromuscular stimulation. With 60 patients, adding neuromuscular stimulation to multilayer compression resulted in a significant two-fold increase in the rate of wound healing over a 4-week period, both in terms of wound margin advance and in terms of percentage area reduction. The use of these short-term intermediate endpoint metrics together with a self-controlled study design offers potential for distinguishing between the relative efficacies of interventions more rapidly, with greater sensitivity, and with fewer subjects than a conventional RCT cohort model.

Keywords: NMES; PAR; WMA; alternate healing endpoint; self-controlled trial; venous leg ulcers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trial design schematic.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Rate of wound margin advance: run‐in phase compared with treatment phase.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Percentage area reduction: run‐in phase versus treatment phase.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
A typical trajectory of a single wound over the 8 weeks.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Guest JF, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, et al. Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009283. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neumann HAM, Cornu‐Thenard A, Junger M, et al. Evidence‐based (S3) guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of venous leg ulcers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:1843‐1875. - PubMed
    1. Harding KG. Chronic wounds: a clinical problem requiring ownership and coordination. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:134‐135. - PubMed
    1. Phillips TJ, Dover JS. Leg ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25:965‐987. - PubMed
    1. Nelson EA, Adderley U. Venous leg ulcers. BMJ Clin Evid. 2016;2016:1902. - PMC - PubMed