Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun;33(3):159-177.
doi: 10.1089/nat.2022.0073. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

Considerations for the Terminal Sterilization of Oligonucleotide Drug Products

Affiliations
Review

Considerations for the Terminal Sterilization of Oligonucleotide Drug Products

Daniel Paul DeCollibus et al. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

A primary function of the parenteral drug product manufacturing process is to ensure sterility of the final product. The two most common methods for sterilizing parenteral drug products are terminal sterilization (TS), whereby the drug product is sterilized in the final container following filling and finish, and membrane sterilization, whereby the product stream is sterilized by membrane filtration and filled into presterilized containers in an aseptic processing environment. Although TS provides greater sterility assurance than membrane sterilization and aseptic processing, not all drug products are amenable to TS processes, which typically involve heat treatment or exposure to ionizing radiation. Oligonucleotides represent an emerging class of therapeutics with great potential for treating a broad range of indications, including previously undruggable targets. Owing to their size, structural complexity, and relative lack of governing regulations, several challenges in drug development are unique to oligonucleotides. This exceptionality justifies a focused assessment of traditional chemistry, manufacturing, and control strategies before their adoption. In this article, we review the current state of sterile oligonucleotide drug product processing, highlight the key aspects to consider when assessing options for product sterilization, and provide recommendations to aid in the successful evaluation and development of TS processes. We also explore current regulatory expectations and provide our interpretation as it pertains to oligonucleotide drug products.

Keywords: autoclave; degradation; drug product; formulation; oligonucleotide; terminal sterilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.S. and J.F. are employed by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; D.D. is employed by Amgen and previously at Biogen; A.T., N.A., and D.R. are employed by AstraZeneca; C.L. and N.A. are employed by Novartis; M.F. and S.P. are employed by GlaxoSmithKline; A.W. is employed by Merck; G.G. is employed by Biogen; P.L.S is employed by Pfizer; K.S. is employed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
EMA decision tree for sterilization choices for aqueous products. EMA, European Medicines Agency.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Terminal sterilization development paradigm for aqueous oligonucleotide products.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Common degradation products for antisense oligonucleotides.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
The effect of formulation buffer on the stability of a model oligonucleotide during terminal sterilization at 115°C for 15 min.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Probability of drug product failing the lower assay limit of 95% due to Degradation (Deg) during Terminal Sterilization (RSD = Relative Standard Deviation).
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Internal container pressure of a 1 mL PFS filled with 0.65 mL fill volume and 0.1 mL head space as a function of temperature. PFS, prefilled syringes.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Worst-case theoretical plunger movement in a 1 mL PFS with 0.65 mL fill volume when sterilized at 121°C at varying support pressures. The different traces show the impact of having head space volumes of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3 mL.

References

    1. Tivesten A, Akhtar N, Stolee J, Fillon Y, Orr R, Hill ML, Van den Bergh L, Huybrechts T, Muslehiddinoglu J and P McCormac. (2018). European Pharma Oligonucleotide Consortium: a move to consolidate oligonucleotide knowledge and share experience within the community. Ther Innov Regul Sci 52:687–688. - PubMed
    1. Zamecnik PC and Stephenson ML. (1978). Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:280–284. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muslehiddinoglu J, Simler R, Hill ML, Mueller C, Amery JH, Dixon L, Watson A, Storch K, Gazziola C, et al. (2020). Technical Considerations for Use of Oligonucleotide Solution API. Nucleic Acid Ther 30:189–197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EMA. (2019). Guideline on the sterilisation of the medicinal product, active substance, excipient and primary container. EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/850374/2015. European Medicines Agency. www.ema.europa.eu/en/sterilisation-medicinal-product-active-substance-ex...
    1. PMDA. (2012). Guidance on the Manufacture of Sterile Pharmaceutical Products Produced by Terminal Sterilisation. www.pmda.go.jp/files/000160794.pdf

MeSH terms

Substances