Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 14;13(2):e069024.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069024.

High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial

Amit Mukerji et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Low pressure nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) has long been the mainstay of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm neonates, at a constant distending pressure of 5-8 cmH2O. When traditional nCPAP pressures are insufficient, other modes including nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are used. In recent years, high nCPAP pressures (≥9 cmH2O) have also emerged as an alternative. However, the comparative benefits and risks of these modalities remain unknown.

Methods and analysis: In this multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial, infants <29 weeks' gestational age (GA) who either: (A) fail treatment with traditional nCPAP or (B) being extubated from invasive mechanical ventilation with mean airway pressure ≥10 cmH2O, will be randomised to receive either high nCPAP (positive end-expiratory pressure 9-15 cmH2O) or NIPPV (target mean Paw 9-15 cmH2O). Primary outcome is feasibility of the conduct of a larger, definitive trial as assessed by rates of recruitment and protocol violations. The main secondary outcome is failure of assigned treatment within 7 days postrandomisation. Multiple other clinical outcomes including bronchopulmonary dysplasia will be ascertained. All randomised participants will be analysed using intention to treat. Baseline and demographic variables as well as outcomes will be summarised and compared using univariate analyses, and a p<0.05 will be considered significant.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the respective research ethics boards at each institution (McMaster Children's Hospital: Hamilton integrated REB approval #2113; Royal Alexandra Hospital: Health Research Ethics Board approval ID Pro00090244; Westmead Hospital: Human Research Ethics Committee approval ID 2022/ETH01343). Written, informed consent will be obtained from all parents/guardians prior to study enrolment. The findings of this pilot study will be disseminated via presentations at national and international conferences and via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Social media platforms including Twitter will also be used to generate awareness.

Trial registration number: NCT03512158.

Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; NEONATOLOGY; RESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic summarising the study process. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; GA, gestational age; NIPPV, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.

References

    1. Schmölzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, et al. Non-Invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f5980. 10.1136/bmj.f5980 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischer HS, Bührer C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013;132:e1351–60. 10.1542/peds.2013-1880 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weisz DE, Yoon E, Dunn M, et al. Duration of and trends in respiratory support among extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021;106:286–91. 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319496 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah PS, Dunn M, Aziz K, et al. Sustained quality improvement in outcomes of preterm neonates with a gestational age less than 29 weeks: results from the evidence-based practice for improving quality phase 3 1 Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2019;97:213–21. 10.1139/cjpp-2018-0439 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 2015;314:1039–51. 10.1001/jama.2015.10244 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data