Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1979 Jan;20(1):68-74.
doi: 10.1136/gut.20.1.68.

Comparison of two doses of cimetidine and placebo in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicentre trial

No authors listed
Clinical Trial

Comparison of two doses of cimetidine and placebo in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicentre trial

No authors listed. Gut. 1979 Jan.

Abstract

Endoscopy, clinical assessment, and laboratory studies were used to compare, in a double-blind multicentre trial, the effects on patients with duodenal ulceration of treatment for four weeks by either placebo or 1 g/day cimetidine, or 2 g/day cimetidine. Ulcer healing occurred in 28% of patients on placebo, 61% of patients on 1 g cimetidine daily, and 70% of patients on 2 g cimetidine daily. Thus cimetidine conferred an advantage over placebo, but the effects of the two doses of cimetidine were not shown to be different. Symptomatic improvement in patients given cimetidine was usually marked and occurred early. Patients were required to report all symptoms, but the only symptom which might have been caused by cimetidine was headache in 5% of patients. Biochemical studies showed significant (though slight) rises in serum uric acid, and serum creatinine but no significant changes occurred in the serum levels of liver enzymes. This study confirms that 1 g is a suitable daily dose of cimetidine for the treatment of duodenal ulceration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1978 Feb 25;1(8061):403-7 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Jul 24;2(7978):174-6 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Jul 24;2(7978):161-4 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1977 Jan 1;1(8001):4-7 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 1977 Mar 5;1(10):317-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources