Validation of the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A multi-institutional collaborative study
- PMID: 36788781
- DOI: 10.1111/iju.15162
Validation of the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A multi-institutional collaborative study
Abstract
Objectives: To validate the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and provide a more accurate stratification model for a heterogeneous intermediate-risk group.
Methods: A total of 1610 patients, who underwent transurethral resection, diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in nine collaborating hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. They were classified into low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-risk, and highest-risk groups, and recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared among the groups. The intermediate-risk group was subdivided into two groups based on the multivariable Cox regression model of recurrence and progression risk factors, and a revised risk model was created.
Results: The progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were well stratified, while the recurrence-free survival of the intermediate-risk group was the shortest among the four groups (p < 0.001). The independent risk factors for recurrence and progression-free survival in the intermediate-risk group were as follows: age ≥ 70 years, sex, multiple tumors, tumor size ≥3 cm, and recurrent cases. The intermediate-risk group was subdivided into two groups: favorable intermediate-risk group and unfavorable intermediate-risk group. The revised risk model showed significant differences.
Conclusion: We validated the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 stratification model. The revised risk model provided a more accurate treatment selection for this disease subset.
Keywords: European Association of Urology; Japanese Urological Association; intermediate risk; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; risk stratification.
© 2023 The Japanese Urological Association.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment on Validation of the risk stratification newly defined in the Japanese Urological Association guidelines 2019 for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A multi-institutional collaborative study.Int J Urol. 2023 May;30(5):481-482. doi: 10.1111/iju.15177. Epub 2023 Mar 16. Int J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36924311 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394-424.
-
- Woldu SL, Bagrodia A, Lotan Y. Guideline of guidelines: non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2017;119:371-80.
-
- Matsumoto H, Shiraishi K, Azuma H, Inoue K, Uemura H, Eto M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer 2019 edition by the Japanese Urological Association: revision working position paper. Int J Urol. 2020;27:362-8.
-
- Matsumoto H, Shiraishi K, Azuma H, Inoue K, Uemura H, Eto M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for bladder cancer 2019 update by the Japanese Urological Association: summary of the revision. Int J Urol. 2020;27:702-9.
-
- Kikuchi E, Fujimoto H, Mizutani Y, Okajima E, Koga H, Hinotsu S, et al. Clinical outcome of tumor recurrence for Ta, T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer from the data on registered bladder cancer patients in Japan: 1999-2001 report from the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol. 2009;16:279-86.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
