Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 3;2(3):150-155.
doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.01.004. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?

Affiliations
Review

Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?

Mickael Lescroart et al. J Intensive Med. .

Abstract

The use of beta(β)-blockers during septic shock aimed at countering peripheral adrenergic stress may be justified by the early reduction in deleterious effects resulting from sympathetic overactivation, and could improve the prognosis of patients in septic shock. Animal studies have demonstrated either a maintenance or increase in cardiac output (CO) despite the decrease in heart rate (HR) associated with improved myocardial performance. The mechanism by which β-blockers alter hemodynamics in septic shock is debated; however, preclinical and clinical data show that β-blockers are safe when started at a low dose. Recent publications (2019-2021) on adrenergic β1 receptor antagonists used in septic shock indicate that esmolol and landiolol should not be used in the early phase. While there is no optimal timing for their administration, a minimum of 12 h after the initiation of vasopressor therapy in stabilized euvolemic patients is a reasonable option. Patients should have a normal cardiac function, although a slight depression is compatible with landiolol use under hemodynamic monitoring. Slow titration in patients who remain tachycardic is preferable to rapid titration. When used to decrease HR, landiolol is also effective in reducing the incidence of new arrhythmias. Results of a well-performed and well-powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating a positive effect on survival - or at least on hard surrogates such as the incidence/duration of organ failure - are pending.

Keywords: Adrenergic β1 receptor antagonists; Norepinephrine; Septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Prof. B. Levy received fees for consulting and a research grant from Baxter and Amomed.

References

    1. Dünser M.W., Hasibeder W.R. Sympathetic overstimulation during critical illness: adverse effects of adrenergic stress. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24(5):293–316. doi: 10.1177/0885066609340519. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Annane D., Trabold F., Sharshar T., Jarrin I., Blanc A.S., Raphael J.C., et al. Inappropriate sympathetic activation at onset of septic shock: a spectral analysis approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(2):458–465. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9810073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrara M., Bollen Pinto B., Baselli G., Bendjelid K., Ferrario M. Baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability can help in understanding the different response to therapy during acute phase of septic shock. Shock. 2018;50(1):78–86. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg J.C., Lillehei R.C., Longerbeam J., Zimmermann B. Studies on hemorrhagic and endotoxin shock in relation to vasomotor changes and endogenous circulating epinephrine, norepinephrine and serotonin. Ann Surg. 1961;154(4):611–628. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196110000-00011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annane D., Vignon P., Renault A., Bollaert P.E., Charpentier C., Martin C., et al. Norepinephrine plus dobutamine vs. epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9588):676–684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61344-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources