Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 21;12(4):e026479.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026479. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Development of a Porcine Model and the Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Duration on Brain Injury

Affiliations

Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Development of a Porcine Model and the Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Duration on Brain Injury

Julia C Slovis et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background The primary objective was to develop a porcine model of prolonged (30 or 60 minutes) pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) followed by 22- to 24-hour survival with extracorporeal life support, and secondarily to evaluate differences in neurologic injury. Methods and Results Ten-kilogram, 4-week-old female piglets were used. First, model development established the technique (n=8). Then, a pilot study was conducted (n=15). After 80% survival was achieved in the final 5 pilot animals, a proof-of-concept randomized study was completed (n=11). Shams (n=6) underwent anesthesia only. Severe neurological injury was determined by a composite score of mitochondrial function, neuropathology, and cerebral metabolism: scale of 0-6 (severe: >3). Among 15 piglets in the pilot study, overall survival was 10 (67%); of the final 5, overall survival was 4 (80%). Eleven piglets were then randomized to 60 (CPR60, n=5) or 30 minutes of CPR (CPR30, n=5); 1 animal was excluded from prerandomization for intra-abdominal hemorrhage (10/11, 91% survival). Three of 5 animals in the CPR60 group had severe neurological injury scores versus 1 of 5 in the CPR30 group (P=0.52). During ECMO, CPR60 animals had lower pH (CPR60: 7.4 [IQR 7.4-7.4] versus CPR30: 7.5 [IQR 7.4-7.5], P=0.022), higher lactate (CPR60: 6.8 [IQR 6.8-11] versus CPR30: 4.2 [IQR 4.1-4.3] mmol/L; P=0.012), and higher ICP (CPR60: 19.3 [IQR 11.7-29.3] versus CPR30: 7.9 [IQR 6.7-9.3] mm Hg; P=0.037). Both groups had greater mitochondrial injury than shams (CPR60: P<0.001; CPR30: P<0.001). CPR60 did not differ from CPR30 in mitochondrial respiration, neuropathology, or cerebral metabolism. Conclusions A pediatric porcine model of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after 60 and 30 minutes of CPR consistently resulted in 24-hour survival with more severe lactic acidosis in the 60-minute cohort.

Keywords: cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mitochondria; pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental methods.
CPR indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EEG, electroencephalogram; HD‐CPR, hemodynamic‐directed CPR; MAP, mean arterial pressure; and SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Model development and study population.
CPR indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and HD‐CPR, hemodynamic‐directed CPR.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Intra‐arrest physiology over 30 (n=5) or 60 (n=5) minutes of CPR.
Data shown are from a mixed effects model comparing predicted values for each group, 30‐minutes CPR and 60‐minutes CPR. Values are predicted difference (standard error) between 60‐minutes CPR versus 30‐minutes CPR. Time was coded differently for variables measured at different frequencies. CBF indicates cerebral blood flow; CoPP, coronary artery perfusion pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; EtCO2, end tidal carbon dioxide; ICP, intracranial pressure; L/P, lactate/pyruvate ratio; MD, cerebral microdialysis; PbtO2, brain tissue oxygenation; and SBP, systolic blood pressure,
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mitochondrial respiration at 24 hours following cardiac arrest.
Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used for nonnormally distributed data. Values are median (interquartile range). CI indicates complex I; CII, complex II; CPR30, treatment group that received CPR for 30 minutes; CPR60, treatment group that received CPR for 60 minutes; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; LEAK, state 4o respiration without ATP production; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylating capacity; and RCR, respiratory control ratio.

References

    1. Okubo M, Chan HK, Callaway CW, Mann NC, Wang HE. Characteristics of paediatric out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation. 2020;153:227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holmberg MJ, Ross CE, Fitzmaurice GM, Chan PS, Duval‐Arnould J, Grossestreuer AV, Yankama T, Donnino MW, Andersen LW. American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines‐Resuscitation Investigators. Annual incidence of adult and pediatric in‐hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12:e005580. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim SJ, Kim HJ, Lee HY, Ahn HS, Lee SW. Comparing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta‐analysis. Resuscitation. 2016;103:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lasa JJ, Rogers RS, Localio R, Shults J, Raymond T, Gaies M, Thiagarajan R, Laussen PC, Kilbaugh T, Berg RA, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E‐CPR) during pediatric In‐hospital cardiopulmonary arrest is associated with improved survival to discharge: a report from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines‐Resuscitation (GWTG‐R) Registry. Circulation. 2016;133:165–176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016082 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamhaut L, Jouffroy R, Kalpodjian A, Deluze T, Phillipe P, Vivien B, An K, Carli P. Successful treatment of refractory cardiac arrest by emergency physicians using pre‐hospital ECLS. Resuscitation. 2012;83:e177–e178. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.03.016 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types