Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr;42(4):757-777.
doi: 10.1002/etc.5584. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

New Approach Methodologies for the Endocrine Activity Toolbox: Environmental Assessment for Fish and Amphibians

Affiliations
Review

New Approach Methodologies for the Endocrine Activity Toolbox: Environmental Assessment for Fish and Amphibians

Constance A Mitchell et al. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Multiple in vivo test guidelines focusing on the estrogen, androgen, thyroid, and steroidogenesis pathways have been developed and validated for mammals, amphibians, or fish. However, these tests are resource-intensive and often use a large number of laboratory animals. Developing alternatives for in vivo tests is consistent with the replacement, reduction, and refinement principles for animal welfare considerations, which are supported by increasing mandates to move toward an "animal-free" testing paradigm worldwide. New approach methodologies (NAMs) hold great promise to identify molecular, cellular, and tissue changes that can be used to predict effects reliably and more efficiently at the individual level (and potentially on populations) while reducing the number of animals used in (eco)toxicological testing for endocrine disruption. In a collaborative effort, experts from government, academia, and industry met in 2020 to discuss the current challenges of testing for endocrine activity assessment for fish and amphibians. Continuing this cross-sector initiative, our review focuses on the current state of the science regarding the use of NAMs to identify chemical-induced endocrine effects. The present study highlights the challenges of using NAMs for safety assessment and what work is needed to reduce their uncertainties and increase their acceptance in regulatory processes. We have reviewed the current NAMs available for endocrine activity assessment including in silico, in vitro, and eleutheroembryo models. New approach methodologies can be integrated as part of a weight-of-evidence approach for hazard or risk assessment using the adverse outcome pathway framework. The development and utilization of NAMs not only allows for replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal testing but can also provide robust and fit-for-purpose methods to identify chemicals acting via endocrine mechanisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:757-777. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Keywords: Adverse outcome pathway; Endocrine-disrupting compounds; In vitro toxicology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclaimer—The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The opinions presented are those of the authors and not necessarily their organizations.

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
Current overview: levels of biological organization and tools in support of chemical ecological assessment. NAM = new approach methodology.
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 2:
An illustration of how new approach methodologies can be integrated to support integrated approaches to testing and assessments. Modified from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). AOP = adverse outcome pathway; NAMs = new approach methodologies; IATAs = integrated approaches to testing and assessments; WoE = weight of evidence.
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 3:
New approach methodologies and in vivo assays available to evaluate endocrine modalities. Italics indicate in development. Test guidelines: 248 (OECD, 2019), 250 (OECD, 2021b), 251 (OECD, 2022), 407 (OECD, 2008), 408 (OECD, 2018b), 440 (OECD, 2007), 441 (OECD, 2009c), 455 (OECD, 2021c), 456 (OECD, 2011a), 457 (OECD, 2012b), 458 (OECD, 2020), 407 (OECD, 2008), 493 (OECD, 2015c). *Representative assays. **Note that, under the current Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the LAGDA is considered primarily for identifying interactions with the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis. ***Hershberger assay specifically measures 5α-reductase inhibition as well. NPLS = nonprotected life stage; QSAR = quantitative structure–activity relationship; ER = estrogen receptor; AR = androgen receptor; TR = thyroid hormone receptor; TG = test guideline; OPPTS = Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances; DIO1, DIO2, and DIO3 = iodothyronine deiodinases 1, 2, and 3; AUR = Amplex UltraRed; EASZY = endocrine active substances, acting through estrogen receptors, using transgenic tg(cyp19a1b:GFP) zebrafish embryos; RADAR = rapid androgen disruption activity reporter; XETA = Xenopus eleutheroembryonic thyroid assay; REACTIV = rapid estrogen activity tests in vivo; OECD = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; LAGDA = larval amphibian growth and development assay; FS[TR]A = fish short-term reproduction assay; FSDT = fish sexual development test; AMA = amphibian metamorphosis assay; MEOGRT = medaka extended one generation reproduction test.
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 4:
Generalized nodes with potential molecular initiating event targets across the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid pathway axes and cross-referenced with available new approach methodologies by type for measuring molecular endpoints. *Ongoing research is clarifying the potential of the embryo assays to detect effects on hormone synthesis, secretion, and systemic distribution. QSAR = quantitative structure–activity relationship; TG = test guideline; TH = thyroid hormone; TPO = thyroperoxidase; NIS = sodium iodide symporter; IYD = iodotyrosine deiodinase; ER = estrogen receptor; EASZY = endocrine active substances, acting through estrogen receptors, using transgenic tg(cyp19a1b:GFP) zebrafish embryos; AR = androgen receptor; RADAR = rapid androgen disruption activity reporter; DIO1, DIO2, and DIO3 = iodothyronine deiodinases 1, 2, and 3; TR, thyroid hormone receptor; XETA = Xenopus eleutheroembryonic thyroid assay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alcaraz AJG, Mikulášek K, Potěšil D, Park B, Shekh K, Ewald J, Burbridge C, Zdráhal Z, Schneider D, Xia J, Crump D, Basu N, & Hecker M (2021). Assessing the toxicity of 17α-ethinylestradiol in rainbow trout using a 4-day transcriptomics benchmark dose (BMD) embryo assay. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(15), 10608–10618. 10.1021/acs.est.1c02401 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrrano JA, Tietge JE, & Villeneuve DL (2010). Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29(3), 730–741. 10.1002/etc.34 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ankley GT, LaLone CA, Gray LE, Villeneuve DL, & Hornung MW (2016). Evaluation of the scientific underpinnings for identifying estrogenic chemicals in nonmammalian taxa using mammalian test systems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 35(11), 2806–2816. 10.1002/etc.3456 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arena M, & van der Linden S (2021). Annex A—Use of the XETA in the assessment strategy of the ECHA/EFSA guidance.
    1. Asnake S, Modig C, & Olsson P-E (2019). Species differences in ligand interaction and activation of estrogen receptors in fish and human. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 195, Article 105450. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105450 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances