Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Aug;19(8):3365-3378.
doi: 10.1002/alz.12962. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

Sex differences in dementia risk and risk factors: Individual-participant data analysis using 21 cohorts across six continents from the COSMIC consortium

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Sex differences in dementia risk and risk factors: Individual-participant data analysis using 21 cohorts across six continents from the COSMIC consortium

Jessica Gong et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Sex differences in dementia risk, and risk factor (RF) associations with dementia, remain uncertain across diverse ethno-regional groups.

Methods: A total of 29,850 participants (58% women) from 21 cohorts across six continents were included in an individual participant data meta-analysis. Sex-specific hazard ratios (HRs), and women-to-men ratio of hazard ratios (RHRs) for associations between RFs and all-cause dementia were derived from mixed-effect Cox models.

Results: Incident dementia occurred in 2089 (66% women) participants over 4.6 years (median). Women had higher dementia risk (HR, 1.12 [1.02, 1.23]) than men, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income economies. Associations between longer education and former alcohol use with dementia risk (RHR, 1.01 [1.00, 1.03] per year, and 0.55 [0.38, 0.79], respectively) were stronger for men than women; otherwise, there were no discernible sex differences in other RFs.

Discussion: Dementia risk was higher in women than men, with possible variations by country-level income settings, but most RFs appear to work similarly in women and men.

Keywords: data harmonization; dementia; diversity; risk factor; sex difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.S.D. has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from UOL Tecnologia Educacional, Brazil; and participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Depression treatment and Aβ dynamics: A study of Alzheimer's disease risk (ABD Study) (1 R01 AG070821‐01A1). R.B.L. received funding support from NIH/NIA 2PO1 AG003949 (Einstein Aging Study), S&L Marx Foundation, Czap Foundation; grants from the FDA, the Migraine Research Foundation, and the National Headache Foundation; served as consultant, advisory board member, and received honoraria from or research support from: Abbvie (Allergan), American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, Amgen, Biohaven, Biovision, Boston, Dr. Reddy's (Promius), Electrocore, Eli Lilly, eNeura, Equinox, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Lundbeck (Alder), Merck, Pernix, Pfizer, Teva, Vector, and Vedanta; and has stock in Biohaven and Manistee. M.J.K. is supported by NIH/NIA AG03949. C.W. is supported by NIH/NIA AG003949. M.G. is supported by French National Research Agency, AXA Research Fund, and Limoges University Hospital (France). N.S. is supported by Alzheimer's Association grant IIRG‐09‐133014, European Social Fund grants 189 10276/8/9/2011, National Strategic Reference Framework‐EU program Excellence Grant (ARISTEIA), and Greek Ministry of Health grants DY2b/oik.51657/14.4.2009, as well as EPAD—Local PI of recruiting site for multinational, multicenter Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) sponsored observational study of prodromal stages of dementia, and NovoNordisc—Local PI of recruiting site for multinational, multicenter industry sponsored phase III treatment trial for Alzheimer's disease; and served on the Chair of Data Safety Monitoring Board for Albert Einstein College of Medicine—NIH funded study. M.Y. is supported by European Social Fund and Ministry of Health, and received fundings from ERASMUS+—European Commission and HORIZON2020 – European Commission; served as the President of the National Nutrition Policy Committee – no fees. M.G. is supported by the National Institute on Aging, NIH, received payments from the University of Connecticut Health Center for honoraria for lectures; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Indiana University School of Medicine; and received honorarium payment from the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. C.C.C. is supported by the NIH (R01 grant: MYHAT study). A.L. and ZARADEMP study was supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Madrid, Spain (grants 94/1562, 97/1321E, 98/0103, 01/0255, 03/0815, 06/0617, G03/128, 12/02254, 16/00896, 19/01874), and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) of the European Union and Gobierno de Aragón, (grant B15_17R). Group #19; A.L. received financial support to attend scientific meeting from Janssen. E.L. has received honorarium from University of Granada. None of these activities was related to the current project. M.W. is supported by Australian NHMRC and EU Horizon 2020, and is a consultant for Amgen and Freeline outside the submitted work; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for DMB STAREE trial (no payment). The rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest. C.D.L.C. has received financial support to attend scientific meetings from Janssen, Almirall, Lilly, Lundbeck, Rovi, Esteve, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, and Casen Recordati. M.W. has been a consultant for Amgen, Freeline, and Kirin outside the submitted work. Author disclosures are available in the supporting information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sex‐specific Kaplan–Meier survival curve (and 95% confidence intervals) for survival probability of all‐cause dementia
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Age‐ and education‐adjusted study‐specific and pooled hazard ratios for all‐cause dementia by sex (women vs. men). CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Age‐ and education‐adjusted pooled hazard ratios for sex (women vs. men) in association with all‐cause dementia, stratified by subgroups. APOE, apolipoprotein E; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Age‐ and education‐adjusted women‐to‐men ratio of hazard ratios for all‐cause dementia by risk factor. APOE, apolipoprotein E; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HDL, high density lipoprotein; HR, hazard ratio; LDL, low density lipoprotein; RHR, ratio of hazard ratios

References

    1. GBD Dementia Forecasting Collaborators . Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nebel RA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease: a call to action. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(9):1171‐1183. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasselgren C, Ekbrand H, Halleröd B, et al. Sex differences in dementia: on the potentially mediating effects of educational attainment and experiences of psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):1‐13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chêne G, Beiser A, Au R, et al. Gender and incidence of dementia in the Framingham Heart Study from mid‐adult life. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(3):310‐320. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sindi S, Kåreholt I, Ngandu T, et al. Sex differences in dementia and response to a lifestyle intervention: evidence from Nordic population‐based studies and a prevention trial. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(7):1166‐1178. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types