Technical Review of Clinical Outcomes Assessments Across the Continuum of Alzheimer's Disease
- PMID: 36790638
- PMCID: PMC10043075
- DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00443-2
Technical Review of Clinical Outcomes Assessments Across the Continuum of Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
Introduction: Insight into the relationship between concepts that matter to the people affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the clinical outcome assessments (COAs) commonly used in AD clinical studies is limited. Phases 1 and 2 of the What Matters Most (WMM) study series identified and quantitatively confirmed 42 treatment-related outcomes that are important to people affected by AD.
Methods: We compared WMM concepts rated as "very important" or higher to items included in COAs used commonly in AD studies.
Results: Twenty COAs designed to assess signs, symptoms, and impacts across the spectrum of AD were selected for review. Among these 20 COAs, only 5 reflected 12 or more WMM concepts [Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory-Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI), Alzheimer's Disease Composite Scores (ADCOMS), and Clinical Dementia Rating; Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR/CDR-SB)]. Multiple symptoms and impacts of AD identified as important and meaningful in the WMM studies map only indirectly at best to 7 of the 20 most widely used COAs.
Conclusion: While many frequently used COAs in AD capture some concepts identified as important to AD populations and their care partners, overlap between any single measure and the concepts that matter to people affected by AD is limited. The highest singly matched COA reflects fewer than half (45%) of WMM concepts. Use of multiple COAs expands coverage of meaningful concepts. Future research should explore the content validity of AD COAs planned for AD trials based on further confirmation of the ecological validity of the WMM items. This research should inform development and use of core outcome sets that capture WMM items and selection or development of new companion tools to fully demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes spanning WMM.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Care partner; Caregiver; Clinical outcome assessment; Clinically meaningful; Outcomes; Patient; Value.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Similar articles
-
Assessing what matters most to patients with or at risk for Alzheimer's and care partners: a qualitative study evaluating symptoms, impacts, and outcomes.Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Jul 30;12(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00659-6. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020. PMID: 32731886 Free PMC article.
-
Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):5889-5900. doi: 10.1002/alz.14050. Epub 2024 Jul 17. Alzheimers Dement. 2024. PMID: 39015065 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing Clinically Meaningful Change on Outcome Assessments Frequently Used in Trials of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease.J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(1):9-18. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.102. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023. PMID: 36641605 Clinical Trial.
-
Souvenaid for Alzheimer's disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 15;12(12):CD011679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011679.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33320335 Free PMC article.
-
Meaningful benefits: a framework to assess disease-modifying therapies in preclinical and early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Apr 19;14(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-00984-y. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022. PMID: 35440022 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Qualitative research and literature review support the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) content validity in early symptomatic AD.J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;12(4):100101. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100101. Epub 2025 Mar 4. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025. PMID: 40044513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dementia Ideal Care: Ecosystem Map of Best Practices and Care Pathways Enhanced by Technology and Community.J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;100(1):87-117. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231491. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024. PMID: 38848182 Free PMC article.
-
Validating a brief performance-based measure of cognition and daily functioning in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;104(3):835-840. doi: 10.1177/13872877251320379. Epub 2025 Mar 25. J Alzheimers Dis. 2025. PMID: 40129402
-
Making outcome measures matter: Why should "what matters to people living with dementia" matter to dementia researchers?Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jun;21(6):e70359. doi: 10.1002/alz.70359. Alzheimers Dement. 2025. PMID: 40545551 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How do we put meaning into meaningful benefit? Perspectives from the lived experience.Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 14;11(2):e70095. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70095. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025. PMID: 40376143 Free PMC article.
References
-
- DiBenedetti D, Slota C, Wronski SL, Vradenburg G, Comer M, Callahan LF, et al. Assessing what matters most to patients with or at risk for Alzheimer's and care partners: a qualitative study evaluating symptoms, impacts, and outcomes. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00659-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Jutten RJ, Papp KV, Hendrix S, Ellison N, Langbaum JB, Donohue MC, et al. Why a clinical trial is as good as its outcome measure: A framework for the selection and use of cognitive outcome measures for clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 doi: 10.1002/alz.12773. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati.... Accessed 31 Mar 2022. - PMC - PubMed
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-focused drug development guidance public workshop: Methods to identify what is important to patients & select, develop or modify fit for purpose clinical outcomes assessments. 2018. https://www.fda.gov/media/116281/download. Accessed 31 Mar 2022.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources