Waterbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 36791786
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764145
Waterbirth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Despite patient interest, there is little evidence regarding waterbirth. This review sought to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in waterbirth, compared with landbirth. This search was conducted using MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 15, 2021, with no language or geographic restrictions. Review was registered with PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42021288576. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of women with singleton cephalic gestations at ≥36 weeks comparing waterbirth to landbirth. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite outcome. Secondary outcomes included maternal and individual perinatal outcomes. Summary measures were reported as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals using random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. I 2 (Higgins I 2) > 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. Six trials including 706 patients were included. When reported, all patients were ≥ 37 weeks' gestation. Labor augmentation (41.7 vs. 84.7%, p < 0.0001) and neuraxial anesthesia (10.5 vs. 72.4%, p < 0.0001) were less common with waterbirth. Estimated blood loss, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration, episiotomy, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes did not differ between groups. Chorioamnionitis and endometritis were not reported by any trial. Maternal satisfaction was higher (p = 0.01) and pain scores lower (p = 0.003) with waterbirth. Length of first stage (p < 0.00001), third stage (p = 0.02), and labor (p = 0.04) were shorter with waterbirth. The composite perinatal outcome could not be calculated due to lack of individual patient data. Compared with landbirth, waterbirth was associated with lower rates of neuraxial anesthesia and lower pain scores, with improved maternal satisfaction. KEY POINTS: · Data are limited regarding the safety and potential benefits of waterbirth.. · With waterbirth, maternal satisfaction was higher and pain scores lower. The first and third stages of labor and labor overall were shorter. No significant differences noted in other maternal outcomes, such as hemorrhage or laceration.. · Insufficient data are available regarding neonatal outcomes..
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Comment in
-
Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, May/June 2023.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 May-Jun;68(3):395-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13507. Epub 2023 May 22. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37212532 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32067972
-
Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):286-319. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12194. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24850284 Review.
-
A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings.Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/birt.12473. Epub 2019 Dec 9. Birth. 2020. PMID: 31820494
-
Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Mar;65(2):216-223. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13033. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 31489975
-
Perineal massage during labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Mar;33(6):1051-1063. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1512574. Epub 2018 Sep 19. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. PMID: 30107756
Cited by
-
Introducing waterbirth in a university hospital setting in Sweden: A qualitative study of midwives' experiences.Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Jun 3;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/188193. eCollection 2024. Eur J Midwifery. 2024. PMID: 38832253 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources