For children admitted to hospital, what interventions improve medication safety on ward rounds? A systematic review
- PMID: 36792347
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324772
For children admitted to hospital, what interventions improve medication safety on ward rounds? A systematic review
Abstract
Objective: Every year, medication errors harm children in hospitals. Ward rounds are a unique opportunity to bring information together and plan management. There is a need to understand what strategies can improve medication safety on ward rounds. We systematically reviewed published interventions to improve prescribing and safety of medicines on ward rounds.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.
Setting: Studies examining inpatient ward rounds.
Patients: Children and young people aged between 0 and 18 years old.
Interventions: Any intervention or combination of interventions implemented that alters how paediatric ward rounds review inpatient medications.
Main outcome measure: Primary outcome was improvement in medication safety on paediatric ward rounds. This included reduction in prescribing error rates, healthcare professionals' opinions on prescribing and improvement in documentation on ward rounds.
Results: Three studies were eligible for review. One examined the use of an acrostic, one the use of a checklist, and the other a use of a specific prescribing ward round involving a clinical pharmacist and doctor. None of the papers considered weight-based errors or demonstrated reductions in clinical harm. Reductions in prescribing errors were noted by the different interventions.
Conclusions: There are limited data on interventions to improve medication safety in paediatric ward rounds, with all published data being small scale, either quality improvement or audits, and locally derived/delivered. Good-quality interventional or robust quality improvement studies are required to improve medication safety on ward rounds.
Prospero registration number: CRD42022340201.
Keywords: Paediatrics; Pharmacology.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of clinical pharmacist interventions in paediatric hospital patients.Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;177(8):1139-1148. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3187-x. Epub 2018 Jun 19. Eur J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29915870
-
Including pharmacists on consultant-led ward rounds: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial.Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Aug;11(4):312-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-4-312. Clin Med (Lond). 2011. PMID: 21853822 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A new approach on assessing clinical pharmacists' impact on prescribing errors in a surgical intensive care unit.Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Oct;41(5):1184-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00874-8. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019. PMID: 31332648 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of a pharmacist on post-take ward round prescribing and medication appropriateness.Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0775-9. Epub 2019 Jan 4. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019. PMID: 30610543 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing ward rounds: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to enhance patient safety.Br J Surg. 2025 Mar 28;112(4):znaf041. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf041. Br J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40202092 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Impact of clinical pharmacist-led intervention for drug-related problems in neonatal intensive care unit a randomized controlled trial.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1242779. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1242779. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37645440 Free PMC article.
-
Medication Safety Gaps in English Pediatric Inpatient Units: An Exploration Using Work Domain Analysis.J Patient Saf. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):7-15. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001174. Epub 2023 Nov 3. J Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 37921742 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical